Vibroengineering Procedia (VP) ISSN (Print) 2345-0533, ISSN (Online) 2538-8479 publishes as short Conference papers presented at VIBROENGINEERING Conferences. Every consecutive Volume of Vibroengineering Procedia is dedicated to a separate Conference.
Authors of best papers presented at International Conferences on VIBROENGINEERING are invited to extend their manuscripts to full journal papers which are considered for publication in Journal of Vibroengineering (indexed in SCI) and Journal of Measurements in Engineering (indexed in SCI, Inspec, EBSCO and Gale Cengage).
International Conference Series on VIBROENGINEERING is an ideal platform for presenting your recent results in the area of Vibroengineering to the scientific and engineering community Worldwide. Also, International Conference Series on Vibroengineering provides a unique opportunity for building not only your research & industrial network, but also your career in this thriving field of Vibroengineering.
With great excitement, we'd like to present our conferences schedule in 2018:
*Topics are not limited to the main theme. More information can be found at www.jveconferences.com.
Since 1999 JVE International is the Organizer of a series of International Conferences which attract speakers from more than 30 around globe. From 2013 till 2015, International Conferences on Vibroengineering were organized at two different locations - one in Europe - another in the Far East. Such venue localization helped our Authors to minimize their travel costs and benefit to the Internalization of our Conference Series.
The number of conferences and different locations grew substantially over the past years of JVE Conferences:
Prof. Minvydas Ragulskis
Kaunas University of Technology, JVE International, Lithuania
|H. Adeli||The Ohio State University, (USA)|
|V. Babitsky||Loughborough University, (UK)|
|R. Bansevičius||Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)|
|M. Bayat||Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, (Iran)|
|I. Blekhman||Mekhanobr – Tekhnika Corporation, (Russia)|
|K. Bousson||University of Beira Interior, (Portugal)|
|A. Bubulis||Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)|
|R. Burdzik||Silesian University of Technology, (Poland)|
|M. S. Cao||Hohai University, (China)|
|Lu Chen||Beihang University, (China)|
|F. Chernousko||Institute for Problems in Mechanics, (Russia)|
|Z. Dabrowski||Warsaw University of Technology, (Poland)|
|Y. Davydov||Institute of Machine Building Mechanics, (Russia)|
|J. Duhovnik||University of Ljubljana, (Slovenia)|
|S. Ersoy||Marmara University, (Turkey)|
|A. Fedaravičius||Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)|
|R. Ganiev||Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, (Russia)|
|W. H. Hsieh||National Formosa University, (Taiwan)|
|V. Kaminskas||Vytautas Magnus University, (Lithuania)|
|V. Kappatos||University of Southern Denmark, (Denmark)|
|V. Klyuev||Association Spektr – Group, (Russia)|
|G. Kulvietis||Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, (Lithuania)|
|V. Lyalin||Izhevsk State Technical University, (Russia)|
|R. Martonka||Technical University of Liberec, (Czech Republic)|
|R. Maskeliūnas||Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, (Lithuania)|
|L. E. Muñoz||Universidad de los Andes, (Colombia)|
|N. Nistico||University of Roma La Sapienza, (Italy)|
|V. Ostaševičius||Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)|
|A. Palevičius||Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)|
|G. Panovko||Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, (Russia)|
|L. Qiu||Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (China)|
|Kazimieras Ragulskis||Lithuanian Academy of Sciences|
|S. Rakheja||Concordia University, (Canada)|
|V. Ranjan||Bennett University, (India)|
|V. Royzman||Khmelnitskiy National University, (Ukraine)|
|G. E. Sandoval-Romero||The National Autonomous University of Mexico, (Mexico)|
|M. A. F. Sanjuan||University Rey Juan Carlos, (Spain)|
|E. Shahmatov||Samara State Aerospace University, (Russia)|
|A. El Sinawi||The Petroleum Institute, (United Arab Emirates)|
|G. Song||University of Houston, (USA)|
|S. Toyama||Tokyo A&T University, (Japan)|
|K. Uchino||The Pennsylvania State University, (USA)|
|A. Vakhguelt||Nazarbayev University, (Kazakhstan)|
|A. Valiulis||Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, (Lithuania)|
|P. Vasiljev||Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, (Lithuania)|
|V. Veikutis||Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, (Lithuania)|
|J. Viba||Riga Technical University, (Latvia)|
|J. Wallaschek||Leibniz University Hannover, (Germany)|
|Xiao-Jun Yang||China University of Mining and Technology, (China)|
Your manuscript should be submitted online via JVE Journal Management System (JMS) https://manage.jvejournals.com.
Using the JMS requires an account. You can create a new account by following the ‘Create an account’ link that appears on the main login page. The signup process only takes a minute – we don’t need many details from you. Once you’ve created your account or signed in, you’re ready to submit a manuscript: Submit manuscript.
Your manuscript should be uploaded in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF formats. Note that if your manuscript is accepted for publication, the manuscript will be reprocessed by JVE team. But to start with, manuscript format should conform the Paper Template.
All manuscripts will be assigned to at least two qualified reviewers through 7 steps described below. Decisions will be made as rapidly as possible, and the journal strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors within 6-12 weeks.
On receiving an article, the Editorial office will pre-screen your manuscript in 1 week. The Editor in charge of the manuscript will check whether the manuscript is valid, does fall into the scope of the Journal, the presentation language is fluent, and the contribution to the state of the art is clear.
Following is a formal review process accomplished by external anonymous reviewers. Please note that the final decision on the acceptance / rejection of your manuscript is upon the Editor-in-Chief or one of the Associate Editors.
Each article submitted to JVE will be accepted or rejected according to the originality, contribution to the state of the art in the field, the fitness to the scope of the Journal, quality of content, and presentation of the submitted manuscript.
For all parties involved in the process of publishing (the author, the journal editor(s), peer reviewers and the publisher) it is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior. The ethics statements for our journal are based on Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011).
Submitted manuscripts are evaluated for their intellectual and scientific content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The Editor-in-Chief, the handling Associated Editor responsible for the submitted manuscript and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an Editor's own research without the explicit written consent of the author(s).
The Editor-in-Chief of the journal or the handling Associate Editor is responsible for deciding which of the submitted articles should be published. The Editor-in-Chief and the handling Associate Editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's Editorial Board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with the handling Associate Editor, other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Peer review assists the Editor-in-Chief and the handling Associate Editor in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communication with the author, may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.
Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should immediately notify the Editor-in-Chief so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inacceptable. Referees should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the Editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published data of which they have personal knowledge.
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the submitted manuscript.
Authors reporting results of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Parallel submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as coauthors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be named in an Acknowledgement section. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authorsv(according to the above definition) and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the author list of the manuscript, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Authors could be asked to provide the raw data of their study together with the paper for editorial review. In any event, authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least ten years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject-based data repository or other data center), provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and legal rights concerning proprietary data do not preclude their release.
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the authors must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal’s Editor-in-Chief or publisher and cooperate with them to either retract the paper or to publish an appropriate erratum. The publisher has the right to retract any published manuscript(s) with or without prior notification to the author(s).
In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism the publisher, in close collaboration with the Editor-in-Chief, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum or, in the most severe cases, the complete retraction of the affected work.
The Publisher and the Journal do not discriminate on the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran status, national origin, race, gender, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in its publishing programs, services and activities.
CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative to providing a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of an article or other published content. By applying the CrossMark logo, JVE is committed to maintain the content it publishes and to alert readers to changes if and when they occur.
JVE International recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and takes care of the highest importance to maintain trust in the authority of its electronic archive.
Clicking the CrossMark logo on a document will provide you its current status and will also give you additional publication-record information about the document.
For more information on CrossMark, please visit the CrossMark site.
JVE content that will have the CrossMark logo is restricted to the current and future journal content.