Feature extraction method based on VMD and MFDFA for fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valve
Yan Liu^{1} , Jindong Wang^{2} , Ying Li^{3} , Haiyang Zhao^{4} , Shuxin Chen^{5}
^{1, 2, 3, 4}Mechanical Science and Engineering Institute, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China
^{1, 5}Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Institute, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, China
^{2}Corresponding author
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 19, Issue 8, 2017, p. 60076020.
https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18726
Received 6 June 2017; received in revised form 7 September 2017; accepted 28 November 2017; published 31 December 2017
Aiming at the nonlinearity, nonstationarity and multicomponent coupling characteristics of reciprocating compressor vibration signals, an integrated feature extraction method based on the variational mode decomposition (VMD) and multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA) is proposed for a fault diagnosis for a reciprocating compressor valve. Firstly, to eliminate the noise interference, a novel VMD method with superior antiinterference performance was utilized to obtain several components of the quasiorthogonal bandlimited intrinsic mode function (BLIMF) from a strong nonstationarity vibration signal, and a consistent number K of BLIMFs was selected based on a novel criterion for all fault states. Secondly, the MFDFA method, which can describe the multifractal structure feature of nonstationary time series, was applied to analyze each BLIMF component, and the parameters of MFDFA were employed as the eigenvectors to reflect the structure characteristics and local scale behavior of the vibration signal. Then, the principal component analysis (PCA) was introduced to refine the eigenvectors for a higher recognition efficiency and accuracy. Finally, the vibration signals of four types of reciprocating compressor valve faults were analyzed by this method, and the faults were identified correctly by pattern classifiers of BTSVM and CNN. Further results comparison with other feature extraction methods verifies the superiority of the proposed method.
Keywords: fault diagnosis, reciprocating compressor valve, variational mode decomposition (VMD), multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA), principal component analysis (PCA).
1. Introduction
As general machinery, reciprocating compressor is widely used in petroleum and petrochemical industries, while due to its complex structure and many vulnerable parts, failures often occur and even lead to some severe consequences such as the production process termination and equipment destruction [1, 2]. According to the statistics, valve is one of the most core and vulnerability components, and it accounts for 60 % of the total failure rate of reciprocating compressors. Therefore, the valve fault diagnosis plays a significant role to guarantee the normal operating condition of reciprocating compressor. Vibration signals are widely used in the machinery fault diagnosis because they contain a lot of operating information. However, due to the nonlinearity, nonstationarity and multicomponent coupling characteristics of reciprocating compressor valve vibration signals, an effective signal processing and information extraction methods are the key to the fault diagnosis process of a reciprocating compressor valve [3]. The traditional signal techniques, such as frequencydomain and timedomain statistical indicators, are not suitable for extracting the effective features from the vibration signals of reciprocating compressor valve faults [4].
As a novel tool for analyzing a mechanical fault signal, the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Local Mean Decomposition (LMD) and other selfadaptive signal processing methods proposed by the relevant scholars have been used widely in the field of mechanical vibration fault diagnosis [36]. Variational mode decomposition (VMD) is a new method of adaptive signal decomposition recently proposed by Dragomiretskiy and Zosso [7], which can decompose a complicated multicomponent vibration signal into a set of modal functions with a limited bandwidth by solving the constrained variational model in the variational frame, and separate the frequency of each signal component. Compared with EMD and LMD, the VMD is a nonrecursive processing method to solve the modal aliasing problem in the EMD which cannot correctly separate the components with similar frequencies due to the sampling frequency. Furthermore, the VMD is a number of adaptive Wiener filter banks, and thus it has more noise robustness and fast convergence [79]. In accordance with the advantages of VMD, it has been successfully utilized for extracting the fault features for nonlinear and nonstationary rubimpact signals [10], instantaneous detection of speech signals [8] and trends analysis of financial markets [11], etc. Therefore, VMD is an appropriate method to analyze reciprocating compressor valve vibration signals with the characteristics of nonlinearity and nonstationarity.
As an effective method for feature extraction methods, fractal analysis [12, 13] is utilized to reveal the nonstationarity and discontinuity characteristics hidden in signals, which can reflect dynamic mechanisms corresponding to the different statuses of nonlinear systems. Further studies show that the multifractal analysis [14, 15] presents the fractal singular probability distribution form of the signal and improves the elaboration degree of signal geometric features and local scale behavior, and has been used for a multiple singularity analysis [16]. With the development of the multifractal theory, Kantelhardt et al. proposed a multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA) method [17]. Compared with conventional multifractal method, it can eliminate sequence trend terms by DFA, which fully reveal the multifractal features hidden in nonstationary time series, and estimate the multifractal spectrum accurately [18]. The literature studies [16, 1922] show that the multifractal singularity spectrum obtained by the MFDFA is a set of parameters which can describe the dynamic behavior of the multifractal time series more accurately. However, the choice criterion of MFDFA parameters is still nonuniform in standards. Some scholars choose only one single singular exponent as the multifractal singularity spectrum parameter to form the eigenvector, while other scholars select the singular exponent ${\alpha}_{+\infty}$, $\alpha \left(0\right)$, ${\alpha}_{\infty}$, $\mathrm{\Delta}\alpha $ as the parameters of the multifractal singularity spectrum. Hence, the proper selection of parameters is very important to reflect the inherent information of multifractal spectrum and the dynamic behavior of time series. In this paper the multifractal singularity spectrum parameters are considered from two aspects, that is, singular exponent $\alpha $ and multifractal spectrum $f\left(\alpha \right)$, and it may realize the fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor accurately.
Owing to the characteristics of nonlinearity, nonstationarity and multicomponent coupling, the vibration signal of the reciprocating compressor contains interference noise. Therefore, it is necessary to preprocess the original signal for reducing or eliminating the noise disturbance before a further analysis. The proposed feature extraction method combined with the selfadaptive decomposition and fractal analysis has become a hot topic in the field of fault diagnosis. Jia, et al. [23] presented an intelligent diagnosis of bearing based on the EMD and MFDFA. Liu [24] proposed a feature extraction method based on the LCD–TEO and MFDFA for a rollingbearing fault diagnosis. Therefore, to extract more accurate multifractal eigenvectors, a feature extraction method combined with VMD and MFDFA is proposed in this paper.
In this research, a novel feature extraction method based on the VMD and MFDFA is proposed, and its application for reciprocating compressor valve fault diagnosis is described. The remaining section of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the principle of VMD and MFDFA. The method and procedures of feature extraction method are described in Section 3. The process of extracting features for different reciprocating compressor valve faults is presented in Section 4. Finally, the conclusion is outlined in Section 5.
2. VMD and MFDFA principles
2.1. VMD algorithm
VMD is a newly developed methodology for adaptive timefrequency analysis signal decomposition based on Wiener filtering, Hilbert transform, analytic signal and frequency mixing, etc. The decomposition process is essentially a special iteration solving variational model, and can noncursively decompose a multicomponent signal into a series of bandlimited intrinsic mode functions (BLIMFS) [7].
2.1.1. Variation model establishment
In order to establish a variational model of signal decomposition, the VMD defines the intrinsic mode function (IMF) as the amplitude modulationfrequency modulation (AMFM), as follows:
where ${A}_{k}\left(t\right)$ is the instantaneous amplitude of ${u}_{k}\left(t\right)$ and ${\phi}_{k}\left(t\right)$ is the instantaneous phase of ${u}_{k}\left(t\right)$, ${\phi}_{k}\left(t\right)$ is the reduction function that instantaneous frequency ${\omega}_{k}\left(t\right)=d{\phi}_{k}\left(t\right)/dt\ge $ 0. Compared to ${\phi}_{k}\left(t\right)$, the variation of ${A}_{k}\left(t\right)$ and ${\omega}_{k}\left(t\right)$ is more gradual that can be regarded as a harmonic signal of constant amplitude and frequency in a smaller time horizon.
On the basis of this definition, the VMD assumes that the input signal$x\left(t\right)$is composed of finite BLIMF components with different center frequencies and limited bandwidth, and transforms the signal decomposition problem into the variational model framework for processing. The minimum sum of the estimated bandwidths of each BLIMF component is sought under the constraint that the sum of the BLIMF components is equal to the input signal $x\left(t\right)$. The constraint variational model established by the VMD is as follows:
where $K$ is the number of the BLIMF component,$\left\{{u}_{k}\right\}=\left\{{u}_{1}\text{,}{u}_{2}\text{,}\dots \text{,}{u}_{K}\right\}$and $\left\{{\omega}_{k}\right\}=\left\{{\omega}_{1}\text{,}{\omega}_{2}\text{,}\dots \text{,}{\omega}_{K}\right\}$ are frequency centers of ${u}_{k}\left(t\right)$. $\delta \left(t\right)$ is Dirichlet function, $*$ symbol is convolution symbol.
2.1.2. Variation model solution
In order to obtain the optimal solution of the above variational model, the VMD constructs the extended Lagrangian function $L\left(\right\{{u}_{k}\left\}\text{,}\text{}\right\{{\omega}_{k}\}\text{,}$$\lambda )$ by introducing a quadratic penalty factor $\alpha $ and Lagrangian multiplier $\lambda \left(t\right)$, as shown in Eq. (3), the constraint problem is transformed into an unconstrained problem. Among them, the quadratic penalty factor can ensure the accuracy of signal reconstruction in the presence of Gaussian noise, while Lagrangian multiplier can guarantee the rigidity of the model constraints:
$+\u27e8\lambda \left(t\right),x\left(t\right){\sum}_{k=1}^{K}{u}_{k}\left(t\right)\u27e9.$
On the basis of this, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is used to update $\left\{{u}_{k}\right\}$, $\left\{{\omega}_{k}\right\}$ and $\lambda $, the saddle point of the extended Lagrangian function is sought to be the optimal value of the variational model shown in Eq. (2), thus decomposing the input signal $x\left(t\right)$ into $K$ BLIMF components. The VMD algorithm is a specific process shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Flow chart of VMD algorithm
2.2. MFDFA
2.2.1. Method description
For nonstationary time series ${x}_{k}$, the process of MFDFA is as follows:
1) Construction of Signal Outlines
where $\u27e8x\u27e9$ is the mean value of time series ${x}_{k}$.
Divide $Y\left(i\right)$ into ${N}_{s}=int\left(N/s\right)$ nonoverlapping segments of equal length s. To take the full advantage of this series, repeat the same process from the opposite end. Consequently, 2${N}_{s}=int\left(N/s\right)$ segments are obtained altogether.
The least square method is used to fit the polynomial trend of 2${N}_{s}=int\left(N/s\right)$ segments, and then to calculate the variance:
where $Y$ is the trend of the polynomial data of the $\upsilon $th segment. If the fitted polynomial trend is order $m$, then the trend process is (MF) DFA_{m}.
Calculate the mean value of the $q$th order ﬂuctuation function:
where $q$ is nonzero real numbers.
4) If there is selfsimilarity of the time series ${x}_{k}$, there is a powerlaw relationship between the mean $Fq\left(s\right)$ of the $q$th ﬂuctuation function and time scale $s$:
where $h\left(q\right)$ is the generalized Hurst exponent. If ${x}_{k}$ is a multifractal time series, then the exponent $h\left(q\right)$ will vary with $q$; if ${x}_{k}$ is a single multifractal time series, then the exponent $h\left(q\right)$ is a constant independent of $q$.
Analytically the relation between the generalized Hurst exponent $h\left(q\right)$ obtained by Eq. (8) and the scaling exponent $\tau \left(q\right)$ obtained by the standard partition function as follows:
The multifractal singular exponent $\alpha $ and multifractal spectrum $f\left(\alpha \right)$ can be obtained by the Legendre transform:
2.3. MFDFA parameters
The multifractal singular spectrum obtained by MFDFA method is a set of parameters which can describe the dynamic behavior of the multifractal time series. The singular exponent $\alpha $ reflects the growth probability of the fractal in a small area. The singular spectrum $f\left(\alpha \right)$ is the fractal distribution function of the singular exponent $\alpha $. The multifractal singular spectrum $f\left(\alpha \right)$ has three characteristic points, namely the left and right end points and the extreme point. As a typical multifractal singular spectrum shown in Fig. 2, the MFDFA parameters are the left end point (${\alpha}_{+\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$), right end point (${\alpha}_{\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$), the width of the multifractal singular spectrum $\mathrm{\Delta}\mathrm{\alpha}={\alpha}_{\infty}{\alpha}_{+\infty}$, and the degree of inhomogeneity ${\alpha}_{0}$ in the extreme point.
To evaluate the above proposed multifractal singular spectrum parameters, the multifractal singular spectrum of a normal state and valve plate fracture state vibration signals were given in Fig. 3, and the multifractal singular spectrum parameters were listed in Table 1. From Fig. 3 and Table 1, we can see that shape and position coordinates of multifractal singular spectrum are different for two fault states, because the shape of the multifractal singular spectrum reflects the characteristics of the vibration signal probability distribution apparently. Based on the above discussion, the sixdimensional eigenvector (${\alpha}_{+\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$, ${\alpha}_{0}$, ${\alpha}_{\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$, $\mathrm{\Delta}\mathrm{\alpha}$) composed of three feature points of the multifractal singular spectrum can reveal the inherent dynamics of nonstationary time series, so they are suitable as the characteristic parameters of the vibration signal.
Fig. 2. Characteristic parameters of multifractal singular spectrum
Fig. 3. Multifractal singular spectrum of cycle of normal state and valve fracture state vibration signals
Table 1. Comparison of multifractal singular spectrum parameters
Valve states

Multifractal singular spectrum parameters


${\alpha}_{+\infty}$

$f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$

${\alpha}_{0}$

${\alpha}_{\infty}$

$f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$

$\u2206\alpha $


Normal state

2.0401

0.0937

1.7438

1.4955

0.2983

0.5447

Valve plate fracture state

2.5587

0.2487

1.9591

1.6961

0.0303

0.8626

3. Feature extraction method based on VMD and MFDFA
The VMD can selfadaptively decompose a complicated multicomponent signal into a series of BLIMFs which contain information about the specific frequency band of the original vibration signal, and the MFDFA is used to eliminate the influence of nonstationary trend of time series through a detrend process. In this section, a feature extraction method based on VMD and MFDFA is proposed.
The VMD can decompose each fault state vibration signal into a series of BLIMF components with a given $K$ value, and the $K$ value may vary for different fault states. Therefore, it is necessary to select a uniform parameter $K$ of VMD decomposition for all fault states.
To solve this problem, the parameter $K$ in VMD is chosen adaptively by using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR). The MRMR criterion is essentially a feature selection method, and its core idea is to use mutual information to calculate the correlation and the redundancy between feature parameters and classification targets. Theoretically, the ideal signal decomposition result should be that each BLIMF component has a large correlation with the original signal, so that the original signal characteristic is well inherited.
Assuming VMD to decompose the vibration signal of the reciprocating compressor valve $x\left(t\right)$to obtain $K$ number BLIMF components$\left\{{u}_{k}\right\}=\left\{{u}_{1},{u}_{2},\cdots ,{u}_{K}\right\}$, the correlation $D$ of $K$ number BLIMF components can be expressed as:
where $I\left({u}_{i},x\right)$ represents the mutual information between ${u}_{i}\left(t\right)$ and $x\left(t\right)$.
Similarly, the redundancy $R$ of the $K$ number BLIMF components can be expressed as:
In summary, the MRMR criterion is obtained as follows [13]:
where $M$ is the MRMR criterion function and $\beta $ is the adjustment factor. The correlation between the BLIMF component, and the original signal is more important than the redundancy, so in this paper $\beta $ is chosen to 0.6.
The MFDFA can analyze each BLIMF component and obtain six multiple $K$ cells for one fault state eigenvector feature vectors. However, for the diagnosis of the reciprocating compressor valve, the enormous amount of eigenvectors may reduce its robustness, and even lead to a decline in the diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, the eigenvector needs to be reduced to extract highlighted information. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is an effective method to extract the feature of the highdimensional data [25]. It can be used to replace the original variables by constructing a new comprehensive variable, which can effectively reflect the integrated information of the original variable.
Based on the above discussion, the scheme of the fault feature extraction method is shown in Fig. 4, and the scheme of the method is briefly described as follows:
Fig. 4. Fault diagnosis scheme
1) For the vibration signals of different fault states, we employ the VMD method to decompose each signal into $K$ ($K$ are usually from 2 to 8) number of BLIMFs, and repeat the decomposition VMD method with another $K$ ($K$ are usually from 2 to 8);
2) For the BLIMFs decomposed by VMD using one number $K$, $M$ values are calculated for BLIMFs of each fault state respectively, and the $M$ values are added in each fault state together, then this calculation is repeated for all parameters $K$ (usually from 2 to 8), and the best $K$ number is selected from BLIMFs which has the biggest sum of $M$ values for all fault states;
3) For $K$ (a special value has been selected) number of BLIMFs, the multifractal spectrum of each BLIMF component is calculated in one fault state, then the left end point(${\alpha}_{\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$), right end point (${\alpha}_{+\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$), extreme point $\alpha \left(0\right)$, and the width of multifractal singular spectrum $\u2206\alpha $ are chosen to construct the sixdimensional eigenvector (${\alpha}_{+\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$, $\alpha \left(0\right)$, ${\alpha}_{\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$, $\u2206\alpha $), and there are six multiple $K$ cells for one fault state eigenvector;
4) The huge amount of cells in eigenvector will decrease the diagnosis accuracy, therefore, the PCA is utilized to reduce the dimension of previously extracted eigenvector, then the PCA dimension reduced eigenvector is taken as the final eigenvector.
4. Fault diagnosis for reciprocating compressor valve based on VMD and MFDFA method
In this study, the proposed VMD and MFDFA method is utilized to extract the fault feature of the valve vibration data from a twostage doubleacting reciprocating compressor of type 2D12 (As shown in Fig. 5). The shaft power of reciprocating compressor is 500 kW, the piston stroke is 240 mm, and the motor speed is 496 rpm.
Fig. 5. Twostage doubleacting reciprocating compressor of 2D12 type
a) Original figure of reciprocating compressor
b) Structural drawing of reciprocating compressor
Valve is one of the core components of reciprocating compressor, its safe and stable operation is of great significance for the reciprocating compressor. The 2D12 reciprocating compressor valve is a ring valve which is composed of valve seat, valve plate, valve lift limiter, spring, screw and nut. Due to the longterm effect of the alternating load, the valve with periodic reciprocating motion is more prone to a failure. This paper mainly investigates three kinds of reciprocating compressor valve failures: spring failure, valve plate fracture and valve plate gap. When the reciprocating compressor valve is abnormal, the performance of the vibration signal in the valve cover side direction will undergo a substantial change. Therefore, this paper extracted valve cover vibration signals as the analysis data. The vibration signals of four primary valve states are shown in Fig. 6 for two periods.
In this paper, we employed the proposed VMD and MFDFA method to extract features for reciprocating compressor valves faults. Using the VMD to decompose the vibration signal of the reciprocating compressor valve faults, the key point is to select the number of parameters $K$. We used the MRMR to choose the appropriate parameter $K$ for the vibration signals of reciprocating compressor valves.
Fig. 6. Vibration acceleration in four reciprocating compressor valve states
Fig. 7. MRMR criterion function $M$ values
Firstly, four different vibration signals of valve faults were decomposed by the VMD with $K=$ 2, 3, ..., 8, respectively. Then, according to Eq. (12) to (14) $M$ values of MRMR criterion function are calculated for BLIMFs in each fault state with a special $K$ value. The $M$ values for each fault state with different $K$ are shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen from Fig. 7 that the $M$ values tend to increase first and then to decrease with the parameter $K$. When $K=$ 3, the sum of $M$ values for four different states reach the maximum. Therefore, in the following study, $K=$ 3 is chosen to decompose the valve fault signals.
Fig. 8. BLIMFs of vibration acceleration in normal state
Fig. 9. BLIMFs of vibration acceleration in valve plate fracture state
Fig. 10. BLIMFs of vibration acceleration in valve plate gap state
Fig. 11. BLIMFs of vibration acceleration in spring failure state
The vibration signals of four valve fault states were decomposed into three BLIMF components by VMD, and they were shown in Figs. 811 respectively. Afterwards, three BLIMF components in each fault state were calculated by the MFDFA to obtain the multifractal singular spectrums. In this paper, the scaling exponent $q$ in MFDFA was set as –10 to 10. In order to show the differences, the multifractal singular spectrum of each BLIMF component for four fault states as shown in Figs. 1214 respectively.
Fig. 12. Multifractal singular spectrums of BLIMF1 components in all states
Fig. 13. Multifractal singular spectrums of BLIMF2 components in all states
Fig. 14. Multifractal singular spectrums in of BLIMF3 components in all states
It can be seen that the multifractal singular spectrum of each state is a parabola with downward opening, and the instantaneous amplitude of the multifractal singular spectrums under four fault states are distinguished from each other, and the position, span and size of the multifractal singular spectrum are also different. The multifractal singular spectrum index $\alpha $ changes within a large range, and demonstrates that the vibration signal is a multifractal process. Besides, the value of $\mathrm{\Delta}\alpha $, $\mathrm{\Delta}f$ under normal condition is the smallest, while those of fault states are obviously higher than the normal state. In brief, the sixdimensional eigenvector (${\alpha}_{+\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$, $\alpha \left(0\right)$, ${\alpha}_{\infty}$, $f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$, $\mathrm{\Delta}\alpha $) of the multifractal singular spectrum, is able to reveal the differences of multifractal characteristics.
In Table 2, we listed the sixdimensional eigenvector of three BLIMF components for each fault state in Figs. 1214, and the numerical values of eigenvectors have a significant difference between four valve states. Then we utilize the PCA to extract the highlighted information, and the final fault eigenvector was shown in Table 3. The cells of eigenvector in Table 2 were reduced from 18 to 6 for each fault state, and it contributes for a higher recognition efficiency and accuracy.
Table 2. Multifractal parameters of each BLIMF component in different valve states
Valve states

Multifractal parameters


${\alpha}_{+\infty}$

$f\left({\alpha}_{+\infty}\right)$

$\alpha \left(0\right)$

${\alpha}_{\infty}$

$f\left({\alpha}_{\infty}\right)$

$\u2206\alpha $


Normal state

BLIMF1

1.8559

0.1644

1.5740

1.3428

0.3884

0.5131

BLIMF2

1.8922

0.0797

1.5815

1.2689

0.2040

0.6233


BLIMF3

1.8234

0.2714

1.5503

1.2102

0.4092

0.6133


Valve plate fracture

BLIMF1

2.5227

–0.0992

1.9543

1.6839

0.0954

0.8388

BLIMF2

1.6836

–0.0979

1.3301

0.9827

0.1959

0.7009


BLIMF3

1.8544

–0.2050

1.3104

0.8019

–0.0101

1.0525


Valve plate gap

BLIMF1

1.9940

0.0008

1.5264

1.2443

0.3788

0.7497

BLIMF2

1.7502

0.0980

1.3867

1.1139

0.5932

0.6362


BLIMF3

1.8354

0.1800

1.5057

1.1384

0.3682

0.6970


Spring failure

BLIMF1

2.8369

–0.3271

2.0045

1.8578

0.6212

0.9791

BLIMF2

1.0954

–0.1606

0.5830

0.2464

0.1829

0.8490


BLIMF3

1.0827

0.1442

0.6979

0.1635

0.0619

0.9192

Table 3. Final state eigenvector in different valve states
Valve states

Final state eigenvector


Normal

–0.0357

–0.1070

0.1650

0.0340

–0.1293

0.0730

Valve plate fracture

–0.8435

0.0079

0.4011

–0.2479

0.4423

0.2400

Valve plate gap

0.1960

0.0694

–0.2091

0.0571

0.0131

–0.1265

Spring failure

1.8864

0.0035

–0.9158

–0.1818

–0.9707

0.1783

Further evaluation is needed to assess the effectiveness of the proposed method based on the VMD and MFDFA, and this paper introduces the Binary Tree Support Vector Machine (BTSVM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) methods to evaluate four valve fault eigenvectors. To test this, 150 eigenvector samples were selected from each valve fault respectively, and 100 were taken as training samples, other 50 as test samples. For the BTSVM, the radial basis kernel function was employed, and the kernel parameter $\gamma =$ 3.57 and error penalty parameter $C=$ 1.85 were optimized by the genetic algorithm. The CNN is made up of an input layer, convolution layer, sampling layer, full connection layer and output layer [26, 27]. The size and number of convolution kernel and the sampling width of CNN have an important influence on the fault classification results. Therefore, according to the study of the eigenvector data, the convolution kernel size is set as 2×1, the number of convolution kernel is as 8, the sampling width is as 2×1, the number of neurons in the full connection layer as 8 is based on the experience and constant experimentation. Meanwhile, the weights and bias of the model network are initialized to a random number between 0 and 1. For each fault state, 50 samples were recognized by BTSVM and CNN respectively, and the results are shown in Table 4.
To compare the superiority of this feature extraction method, the same number of training and test samples was extracted by other four methods including EMDMFDFA and PCA, Wavelet packetMFDFA and PCA, MFDFA and PCA, and VMDMFDFA, and then recognized using the BTSVM and CNN. The recognition results are also listed in Table 4.
Table 4. Recognition accuracy of comparison between different methods
Feature
extraction
method

Recognition accuracy (%) of valve states

Total accuracy (%)


Normal

Spring failure

Valve plate fracture

Valve plate gap


BT
SVM

CNN

BT
SVM

CNN

BT
SVM

CNN

BT
SVM

CNN

BT
SVM

CNN


VMDMFDA and PCA

98

100

96

98

100

98

98

100

98

99

EMDMFDFA and PCA

96

98

92

94

96

96

90

92

93.5

95

Wavelet packetMFDFA and PCA

92

92

90

92

92

94

90

90

91

92

MFDFA and PCA

90

90

88

90

90

92

90

92

89.5

91

VMDMFDFA

94

94

90

92

94

96

90

90

92

93

The results show that both the accuracy in each state and the total accuracy of the proposed method are better than those of four other feature extraction methods under the condition of the same finite number of samples. Feature vectors extracted by VMDMFDFA and PCA, the EMDMFDFA and PCA and Wavelet packetMFDFA and PCA are better than those achieved by the MFDFA and PCA from the result of recognition rate, so it is necessary to combine the selfdecomposition method with MFDFA for resisting noise interference and highlighted information extraction, while the VMD is more superior method than the EMD and Wavelet packet for these fault vibration signals according to the better recognition rate. From Table 4, we also see that the fault recognition rates of VMDMFDFA without PCA are lower than those of the proposed method, so it validates the necessity of using PCA in this method. Through the comparative researches above, the proposed method is the superior feature extraction method to diagnosis faults of reciprocating compressor valve effectively and accurately.
5. Conclusions
According to the nonlinearity, nonstationarity and multicomponent coupling characteristics of reciprocating compressor vibration signals, this paper presents a novel feature extraction method based on the VMD and MFDFA, and it is applied for the fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valve faults.
1) In the proposed method, a novel VMD method was employed to eliminate the noise interference, which outperforms the traditional time frequency analysis method such as the EMD and Wavelet packet for the reciprocating compressor vibration signals.
2) After the BLIMF components being characterized by the MFDFA method, the PCA was employed to refine the final eigenvector, and it indeed has a higher recognition efficiency and accuracy.
3) This method was applied for the fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor at different valve states, and it demonstrates superior recognition results through the comparison with other feature extraction methods.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M581423), School Cultivate Fund of Northeast Petroleum University in China (XN2014105), Natural Science Foundation in China (51505079)，Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province in China (E2015037, E2016009), Supported by the Northeast Petroleum University Innovation Foundation For Postgraduates (YJSCX2017020NEPU) and Basic Science and Engineering on Special Project of Heilongjiang Province Education Department (135109219).
References
 Elhaj M., Gub F., Ballb A. D. Numerical simulation and experimental study of twostage reciprocating compressor for condition monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 22, 2008, p. 374389. [Search CrossRef]
 Almasi A. New study and model for the mechanism of process reciprocating compressors and pumps. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 224, 2010, p. 143148. [Publisher]
 Zhang S., Xu M., Li Y., Zhao H., Wang R. Valve fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor based on hybrid method. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 35, 2016, p. 167173. [Search CrossRef]
 Zhao H., Wang J., Jie X., Gao Y. Feature extraction method based on LMD and MSE and its application for fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor. Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 17, Issue 7, 2015, p. 35153526. [Search CrossRef]
 Tang Y., Liu Q. Y., Xie C., et al. Study on stress distribution of a subsea Ram BOP body based on simulation and experiment. Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 50, 2015, p. 3950. [Search CrossRef]
 Wang J. D., Gao Y. Q., Zhao H. Y., Cong R. Sectional normalization and recognization on the PVDiagram of reciprocating compressor. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, Vol. 3, 2015, p. 3541. [Search CrossRef]
 Dragomiretskiy K., Zosso D. Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Process, Vol. 62, Issue 3, 2014, p. 53144. [Search CrossRef]
 Upadhyay A., Pachori R. B. Instantaneous voiced/nonvoiced detection in speech signals based on variational mode decomposition. Journal of The Franklin Institute, Vol. 352, 2015, p. 26792707. [Search CrossRef]
 Aneesh C., Kumar S., Hisham P. M., Soman K. P. Performance comparison of variational mode decomposition over empirical wavelet transform for classification of power quality disturbances using support vector machine. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 46, 2015, p. 372380. [Search CrossRef]
 Wang Y., Markert R., Xiang J., Zheng W. Research on variational mode decomposition and its application in detecting rubimpact fault of rotor system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 60, 2015, p. 24351. [Search CrossRef]
 Lahmiri S. Long memory in international financial markets trends and short movements during 2008 financial crisis based on variational mode decomposition and detrended fluctuation analysis. Physica A, Vol. 437, 2015, p. 130138. [Search CrossRef]
 Li P., He Q., Kong F. Approach to fault diagnosis of bearings using waveletbased fractal analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), 2010, p. 23382343. [Publisher]
 Wang Q., Zhang X. Application of fractal theory to fault diagnosis for hydraulic pump. Journal of Dalian Maritime University Vol. 2, 2004, p. 012. [Search CrossRef]
 Yu Y., Baoliang L., Jingshan S., Shixuan Y. Application of vibration signal multifractal in fault diagnosis. Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Future Networks, 2010, p. 164167. [Publisher]
 Ke P. Z., Yong H. Y., Qing L., Fulei C. Wavelet multifractal spectrum: application to analysis vibration signals. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 8, 2002, p. 13. [Search CrossRef]
 Wang J., Wei W., Li H., Li X. Multifractal features extraction of bearing faults for reciprocating compressor. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 27, 2008, p. 313315. [Search CrossRef]
 Kantelhardt J. W., Zschiegner S. A., KoscielnyBunde E., Havlin S., Bunde A., Stanley H. E. Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 316, 2002, p. 87114. [Search CrossRef]
 Talebinejad M., Chan A. D. C., Miri A. Fatigue estimation using novel multifractal detrended fluctuation analysisbased approach. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 2010, p. 433439. [Search CrossRef]
 Li M., Ma W. X., Liu X. J. Investigation of rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on multifractal and general fractal dimension. 2nd Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, IEEE Computer Society, Zhangjiajie, 2009, p. 545548. [Search CrossRef]
 Yu Y., Li B. L., Shang J. S., et al. Application of vibration signal multifractal in fault diagnosis. 2nd International Conference on Future Networks, IEEE Computer Society, Sanya, 2010, p. 164167. [Publisher]
 Tang J. Y., Shi Y. B., Zhou L. F., et al. Nonlinear analog circuit fault diagnosis using wavelet leaders multifractal analysis method. Control and Decision, Vol. 25, Issue 4, 2010, p. 605609. [Search CrossRef]
 Lin Jinshan, Chen Qian Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings based on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis and Mahalanobis distance criterion. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2013, p. 515533. [Search CrossRef]
 Jia F., Wu B., Xiong X. Y., Xiong S. B. Intelligent diagnosis of bearing based on EMD and multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), Vol. 46, Issue 2, 2015, p. 491497. [Search CrossRef]
 Liu H. G., Wang X., Lu C. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on LCDTEO and multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. Vols. 6061, 2015, p. 273288. [Search CrossRef]
 Dunia R., Qin Joe S. Joint diagnosis of process and sensor faults using principal component analysis, Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 6, 1998, p. 457469. [Search CrossRef]
 Karpathy A., Toderici G., Shetty S., et al. Largescale video classification with convolutional neural networks. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014, p. 17251732. [Publisher]
 Oquab M., Bottou L., Laptev I., et al. Learning and transferring midlevel image representations using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2014, p. 17171724. [Search CrossRef]
Cited By
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management
Amitkumar Patil, Gunjan Soni, Anuj Prakash

2021

Shock and Vibration
Wei Cui, Guoying Meng, Aiming Wang, Xinge Zhang, Jun Ding, M.Z. Naser

2021

Measurement Science and Technology
Chong Shi, Yan Ren, Hesheng Tang, Leaven Romeo Mupfukirei

2021

Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Dongmei Wang, Lijuan Zhu, Jikang Yue, Jingyi Lu, Gongfa Li

2021

Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
Zhuolin Li, Dongmei Fu, Ying Li, Zibo Pei, Qiong Yao, Jinbin Zhao

2020

Guangyi Chen, Changfeng Yan, Jiadong Meng, Lixiao Wu 
2020

Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hongbai Yang, Jiangan Zhang, Leilei Chen, Hongli Zhang, Shulin Liu

2019

Materials
Zhuolin Li, Dongmei Fu, Ying Li, Gaoyuan Wang, Jintao Meng, Dawei Zhang, Zhaohui Yang, Guoqing Ding, Jinbin Zhao

2019
