Numerical simulation and optimization for the vibration of the seed metering device based on a novel MLIGA method
Yan Lei Xu^{1} , Qi Wang^{2} , Long Tu Zhu^{3} , Dong Yan Huang^{4}
^{1, 2, 3, 4}Key Laboratory of Bionics Engineering, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, 130025, China
^{1}College of Information, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China
^{4}Corresponding author
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 19, Issue 5, 2017, p. 31513168.
https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.17171
Received 15 May 2016; received in revised form 11 July 2017; accepted 14 July 2017; published 15 August 2017
JVE Conferences
The reported researches only analyze vibration parameters of the seedmetering device. However, they do not adopt any algorithm to conduct a multiobjective optimization for the vibration performance of the seedmetering device. In this paper, the vibration of the seedmetering device is numerically computed firstly, and the correctness of the computational model is validated by experimental test. Then, some parameters including the plate thickness, inclination angle, excitation source position and supporting leg thickness of the seedmetering device are studied. In this way, those parameters which have serious impacts on the vibration are obtained. Therefore, the vibration performance is tried to optimize using these parameters as the design variables. This paper proposes a novel multilayer immune algorithm based on genetic algorithms (MLIGA). In order to further verify validity of the novel MLIGA model for optimizing the vibration of the seedmetering device, it is compared with the traditional GA model and PSOGA model. When the iteration of MLIGA model was conducted to the 156th generation, the predicted error is smaller than the set critical error. Compared with other two kinds of algorithms, the optimized time is reduced. Regarding optimization of the GA model, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 2.49 % and 4.22 % respectively. Regarding optimization of the PSOGA model, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 9.74 % and 6.024 % respectively. Regarding optimization of the MLIGA model, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 17.34 % and 6.78 % respectively. Obviously, structures with better performance can be obtained through using the novel MLIGA model.
Keywords: seedmetering devices, vibration, optimization, novel MLIGA model, GA model, PSOGA model.
1. Introduction
In recent years, vibration seedmetering devices have been studied and applied widely because they bring no damage and could get adapted to different seeds. Vibration seedmetering devices are mainly divided into mechanical vibration type, electromagnetic vibration type, and pneumatic vibration type [15]. Pneumatic vibration types are widely applied in protective sowing operations. Straws and residues are on the surface of protective farming lands, so vibration characteristics of seedmetering devices are different from those during common farming. Vibrations can seriously influence population motion status in a seed chamber. When the vibration is relatively small, populations have a small motion speed and fluidity, and repeated suction rate of seed suction holes is relatively high. When the vibration is relatively serious, the motion speed of populations is high, seed suction of seed suction holes is difficult and suction missing rate is relatively high. Proper vibrations can reduce the suction missing rate and repeated suction rate of seed suction holes relatively [6, 7]. Therefore, it is very necessary to study vibration parameters of pneumatic vibration seedmetering devices.
At present, a lot of scholars have made researches on vibration characteristics of seedmetering devices. Sun [8] designed structures and dimensions of seed suction holes according to seeds. He also conducted an optimization design on structural parameters of horizontal rounddisk seedmetering devices. Song [9] designed a seedmetering device with variable seed suction holes, where adaptability of the seedmetering device to seeds with different shapes and sizes was improved through changing the depth of seed suction holes. Liao [10] established a discrete element model of a centrifugal seedmetering device, and conducted simulation analysis on seed motion during operation of the centrifugal seedmetering device. In order to study vibration parameters of the pneumatic seedmetering device and impacts of the vibration on maize population motion, Zhang [11] used an acceleration sensor and a vibration test system to test vibration characteristics of the seedmetering device and analyzed vibration signals using MATLAB. In order to obtain impacts of design parameters of a seedmetering device on vibration characteristics accurately, Chen [12] applied ADAMS software to establish a simulation model of the seedmetering device and conducted dynamic simulation. Hu [13] adopted the Hertzmindlin contact model to establish a simulation model of seeds and seedmetering devices to study impacts of vibration frequency and amplitude on performance of the seedmetering device. Results showed that when the vibration frequency was 40 Hz and the vibration amplitude was 0.5 mm, the population stacking height was stable, and stable seed supply was achieved. Yu [14] used an approximate model to establish a complete model of the seedmetering device. The motion and dynamic characteristics of hinged points were simulated by rod elements; natural frequencies and modes on top 4 orders were analyzed. In order to further improve accuracy of ordered arrays, Yu [15] studied horizontal vibration characteristics of a vibration plate. Results showed that leaps of rice seeds can be avoided effectively when the excitation frequency was 4.5 Hz, vibration amplitude was 3.5 mm and vibration plate inclination was 10°. Liu [16] applied range and variance analysis to study impacts of vibration parameters of the seed plate on the seed suction rate. To improve the operating efficiency of seeders and enable the seedermetering device to keep good metering performance at different speeds, an [17] proposed a multifunctional smart test bench for STB700 seedermetering devices, which was used for metering and seeding tests with two different kinds of soybean and maize seeds.
The mentioned researches only analyze vibration parameters of the seedmetering device. However, they do not adopt any algorithm to conduct an optimization design for vibration performance of the seedmetering device. Yu [18] applied orthogonal experiments to study impacts of each parameter of the seedmetering device on the sequencing effects. The impact sequence of parameters and a group of optimized structural parameters were obtained. Yang [19] analyzed related structures of the seedmetering device and conducted orthogonal experiments of parameters. Main parameters which could affect the seedmetering device were determined. However, optimized results of the orthogonal experiment are not accurate and the convergence speed was very slow, so data rules can hardly be determined.
Common optimization methods can easily get trapped in local extreme values, which could lead to endless loop and iteration termination [2025]. Therefore, the paper proposes a novel multilayer immune algorithm based on genetic algorithms (MLIGA). The model is divided into an upper layer and a lower layer. The antibody subpopulation on the lower layer and the antibody subpopulation on the upper layer are organized. There are $NN$ subpopulations in the lowerlayer antibody subpopulation, and each subpopulation has $m$ antibodies. A population is divided into multiple subpopulations, so diversity of individuals in the population can be maintained effectively, and the search characteristics of the traditional genetic algorithm are maintained [2628]. Adaptive characteristics of the immune algorithm are used to solve the multiobjective function solution [2931]. Defects including premature convergence and high sensitivity to problem scale presented in application of the singlepopulation evolution computation can be avoided effectively. Through using the competitiontype coevolution, the convergence speed and convergence accuracy of each lowerlayer subpopulation can be increased effectively. Through upgrade, lowerlayer subpopulations are upgraded to the higher layer in order to constitute a higherlayer antibody subpopulation. A parallel genetic algorithm based on collaborative cooperation is used for operations on the higher layer. The information communication and cooperation are achieved through the individual migration. Through the updating, subpopulations obtained after higherlayer optimization are updated to corresponding lowerlayer subpopulations. Finally, the proposed MLIGA method is applied to a multiobjective optimization of the seedmetering device. Therefore, the structure with optimal performance is obtained.
2. Numerical computation for vibration modals of the seedmetering device
The seedmetering device is composed of pneumatic vibrator, vibration plate and supporting legs. Cyclic excitation forces provided by the pneumatic vibrator can make the vibration plate generate reciprocating motion. Under effects of gravity and traction inertia forces, seeds on the vibration plate would slide forwards along the vibration plate. When the seedmetering device vibrates, root parts of the supporting legs are fixed on a lower support by belts. The complete system is connected to upper parts of the supporting legs. Lower parts of supporting legs can also be deemed to be fixed, namely fixed constraint. Upper parts of the supporting legs are connected to the left and right brackets of the vibration plate, and they are also firmly connected by belts. Supporting legs and the vibration plate are objects of the finite element analysis. Solid models of them are established respectively in the model. However, in the fixed connection, relative motion does not take place between the supporting legs and the brackets. In fact, they are already integrated. Constraints between them are analyzed through direct integral adhesion between supporting legs and brackets, as shown in Fig. 1(a).
Fig. 1. Geometric model and finite element model of the seedmetering device
a) Geometric model
b) Finite element model
During dividing meshes of a model, impacts of mesh quality on the computational accuracy and time should be considered. Meshes with a high quality would have a high accuracy for computational results and shorter computation time. Meshes with poor quality would stop the computation. After meshes are finished, amounts of elements and nodes should be checked, as well. Too many elements which are more than the computational scope of a computer will affect the finite element analysis. Too many elements may be caused by that the geometric model which has sharp corners, round corners, mutations and other problems. At these positions, meshes will be very dense, so the number of elements increased. The minimum size of elements is 5 mm. In order to achieve mesh division conveniently, the paper adopts free division method. The final finite element model has 10289 elements and 14987 nodes, as shown in Fig. 1(b). A rigid region is established on the bottom of supporting legs, and masterslave nodes are set. Element nodes at the bottom center of supporting legs are taken as master nodes. Element nodes on the outer surface of supporting legs are taken as slave nodes. The established rigid region is used to command the connection of masterslave nodes. A rigid region is established at the installation position of vibrator.
The center point of vibrator is taken as the master node; nodes at joints between vibration plate and vibrator are taken as slave nodes which are connected to masterslave nodes. Rigid regions are established to ensure that constraint and vibration force can be transferred to the vibration plate through the master nodes. In order to reflect vibration situations of the vibration plate actually, spring elements are disposed on the bottom of supporting legs, and master nodes disposed at the bottom center of supporting legs are taken as end nodes of the spring elements. Structures of the seedmetering device are made of Q235. Parameters of the finite element analysis are set as follows: elasticity modulus is 2.06e^{11}^{}Pa, density is 7850 kg/m^{3} and Poisson’s ratio is 0.3.
Modal analysis is used to compute vibration characteristics of structures, namely natural frequencies, modes and mode participation coefficient. Modes are a natural characteristic of a structure. Mode information is an important parameter to be used for structural design and improvement. Meanwhile, responses of the structure under different working conditions are decided by vibration characteristics, so it is necessary to conduct mode analysis and obtain its information on each order of the structure before the dynamic analysis is conducted. Seedmetering devices conduct an ordered array of rice seeds using large vibration amplitudes and forces generated during structural resonance. Therefore, its working point is inevitably located around the resonance frequency of a low order (first order in general). Fig. 2 shows modes on top 6 orders of the seedmetering device, where the firstorder frequency is 6.25 Hz. It is shown in the figure that the firstorder mode is mainly reflected by horizontal reciprocating motion of the vibration plate caused by bending vibration of supporting legs. In this way, motion of seeds can be motivated. It is a working vibration mode of the seedmetering device. The secondorder mode is reflected by secondorder bending vibration of supporting legs and the vertical vibration of vibration plate. Most serious vibration is mainly distributed at the center of vibration plate. Modes of other orders are mainly reflected by local vertical vibration of the vibration plate and bending vibration of supporting legs.
Fig. 2. Modes on top 6 orders of the seedmetering device
a) First order
b) Second order
c) Third order
d) Fourth order
e) Fifth order
f) Sixth order
3. Numerical computation for the vibration of the seedmetering device
In order to observe vibration characteristics of the seedmetering device, many observation points are arranged on the seedmetering device, as shown in Fig. 3. In the system, a pneumatic vibrator is taken as the excitation source. Excitation forces are directly applied on the master node Point 5 which is located at the center of the vibrator. The vibration plate generated cyclic reciprocating motion using the supporting legs. The excitation force is obtained through experimental test, as shown in Fig. 4. It is shown in Fig. 4(a) that the excitation force has an obvious periodicity, where the amplitude of the timedomain excitation force is 1.85 mm. Frequencydomain results can be obtained through FFT, as shown in Fig. 4(b). It is shown in Fig. 4(b) that many obvious peak values are in the frequencydomain results, where the maximum peak value is 0.56 mm, and the corresponding frequency is 82 Hz. The interval of peak values is 50 Hz because the timedomain results have an obvious periodicity.
Fig. 3. Arrangement positions of observation points of the seedmetering device
Fig. 4. Timefrequencydomain results of excitation forces of the seedmetering device
a) Timedomain results
b) Frequencydomain results
It is shown in Fig. 1 that the seedmetering device has 4 supporting legs. Timefrequency domain vibration displacements of observation points on the supporting legs are extracted, as shown in Fig. 5. It is shown in the figure that timedomain vibration displacements of supporting legs fluctuate around 0. Maximum timedomain vibration displacements of observation points 1, 2, 3 and 4 are 1. 5mm, 1.8 mm, 2.2 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. Corresponding frequencydomain results are obtained through FFT. It is found in the frequencydomain results that the vibration displacements have peaks around 6.25 Hz, which are caused by fundamental frequency of the seedmetering device. In addition, obvious peaks are around 25 Hz, 50 Hz, 82 Hz, 150 Hz and so forth as the excitation source in Fig. 4 has obvious peak values at these frequencies. In addition, some extra peak values are also in the frequencydomain results, which are caused by structural resonance of the seedmetering device. Obviously, frequencydomain displacement peaks at supporting legs of the seedmetering device are mainly caused by overlaying of natural frequencies of the excitation source and the structure.
4. Experimental test and numerical analysis on the vibration of the seedmetering device
Structural parameters of the seedmetering device will cause obvious impacts on the vibration performance. Therefore, each vibration parameter is studied based on the numerical computation model. As shown in Fig. 3, many observation points in $X$ and $Y$ directions are arranged on the vibration plate. Vibration displacement amplitudes of many observation points are extracted to study each parameter of the seedmetering device.
Fig. 5. Timefrequency domain displacements at supporting legs of the seedmetering device
a) Timedomain results (Point 1)
b) Frequencydomain results (Points 1)
c) Timedomain results (Point 2)
d) Frequencydomain results (Points 2)
e) Timedomain results (Point 3)
f) Frequencydomain results (Points 3)
g) Timedomain results (Point 4)
h) Frequencydomain results (Points 4)
4.1. Experimental verification of the vibration of the seedmetering device
Vibration displacement amplitudes of observation points 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14 in in $X$direction as well as observation points 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 in $Y$direction in Fig. 3 are extracted. Results are shown in Fig. 6. It is shown in Fig. 6(a) that in $X$ direction of the vibration plate, the vibration is stronger when the observation point is farther from the excitation source. The phenomenon is caused by that shaking of supporting legs far from the excitation source could easily cause problems such as distortion and resonance, leading to serious vibration. It is shown in Fig. 6(b) that the vibration in $Y$ direction presents an approximate symmetric distribution with the excitation source as the center. The vibration far from the excitation source is serious gradually, and the weakest vibration is at the position directly facing the excitation source. The phenomenon is caused by constraints of supporting legs and lateral baffles along two ends of the vibration plate in $Y$direction. Therefore, the vibration plate gets deformed, but the strength is much weaker compared with the tail end in $X$direction.
Fig. 6. Vibration amplitudes of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$direction
a) Vibration amplitudes in $X$direction
b) Vibration amplitudes in $Y$direction
Numerical simulation of the vibration performance of the seedmetering device is seriously affected by excitation source and boundary conditions. Therefore, correctness of the model must be verified by experimental test. Multipoint test is used to test the normal displacement of the vibration plate, so the normal displacement distribution of the complete plate under the comprehensive frequency is obtained. The experimental result is compared with vibration characteristics in the numerical computation results. The complete test system is composed of sensors, data lines, data collectors, signal amplifiers and computers, as shown in Fig. 7. The adopted sensor is advantageous in small size, steady work, high accuracy, etc. Equipment produced by B&K Company is used as the data collector. Throughout the experimental test, the sensor is used to collect normal displacement signals of the vibration plate. Signals are input into an analyzer for analyzing and computing. Then, timedomain signals or frequencydomain signals are output by software in the computer. In the timedomain signals, the peak value of output waveforms is the amplitude size of each waveband. In the experimental test, the selection of each structural parameter of the seedmetering device is consistent with the numerical simulation, where the inclination of the vibration plate is 10°. Experimental results of points 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 in the figure are selected to reflect $X$direction vibration distribution of the vibration plate. In a similar way, experimental results of points 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14 which reflect $Y$direction vibration distribution of the vibration plate are also tested.
Comparison results between numerical simulation and experimental test are shown in Fig. 8. It is found in the figure that variation tendencies of the vibration displacements are completely consistent in $X$ and $Y$ directions. The maximum difference of vibration displacements in $X$direction is 5.1 %. The maximum difference of vibration displacements in $Y$direction is 1.5 %. Obviously, the numerical simulation has a high accuracy and can replace the experimental test. Result errors between numerical simulation and experimental test are mainly caused by following reasons: models established in finite element simulation are different from actual structures to a certain extent. During the experimental test, actual structures of the seedmetering device are affected and interfered by many factors. Natural and human operation errors are in the testing system and will affect the experimental results.
Fig. 7. Experimental test of the vibration performance of the seedmetering device
Fig. 8. Vibration amplitudes of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$direction
a) Vibration amplitudes in $X$direction
b) Vibration amplitudes in $Y$direction
4.2. Impacts of the plate thickness on the vibration of the seedmetering device
Based on the verified computation model, the thickness of the vibration plate is changed within 4 mm7 mm, and the step length is 1 mm. The vibration of the seedmetering device under 4 working conditions is computed. Results are shown in Fig. 9. It is shown in Fig. 9(a) that in $X$ direction of the vibration plate, the vibration is stronger when the observation point is farther from the excitation source in the same thickness. The phenomenon is caused by that shaking of supporting legs far from the excitation source could easily cause problems including distortion and resonance, leading to serious vibration. It is shown in Fig. 9(b) that the vibration in $Y$ direction presents an approximate symmetric distribution with the excitation source as the center, where vibration far from the excitation source is serious gradually. The weakest vibration is at the position directly facing the excitation source in the same thickness. The phenomenon is caused by constraints of supporting legs and lateral baffles along two ends of the vibration plate in $Y$direction, so the vibration plate gets deformed, but the strength is much weaker compared with the tail end in $X$direction. In addition, under the working condition with the same distance, the vibration amplitudes in $X$ and $Y$ directions do not decrease gradually with the increased plate thickness. When the plate thickness is 5 mm, the vibration amplitude reaches the maximum value. When the plate thicknesses are 4 mm and 7 mm, the vibration displacements of the seedmetering device are similar. When the vibration displacement is 6 mm, the vibration amplitude has an obvious valley value at the excitation source position in $Y$direction.
4.3. Impacts of inclination angles of the plate on the vibration of the seedmetering device
The inclination angle of the plate is changed within 5°–20°, and the step length is 5°. The vibration of the seedmetering device under 4 working conditions is computed. Results are shown in Fig. 10. It is shown in Fig. 10(a) that in $X$ direction of the vibration plate, the vibration is stronger when the observation point is farther from the excitation source in the same inclination. The phenomenon is caused by that shaking of supporting legs far from the excitation source could easily cause problems including distortion and resonance, leading to serious vibration. It is shown in Fig. 10(b) that the vibration in $Y$ direction presents an approximate symmetric distribution with the excitation source as the center, where the vibration far from the excitation source is serious gradually. The weakest vibration is at the position directly facing the excitation source in the same inclination. The phenomenon is caused by constraints of supporting legs and lateral baffles along two ends of the vibration plate in $Y$direction, so the vibration plate gets deformed, but the strength is much weaker compared with the tail end in $X$direction. In addition, under the working condition with the same distance, the vibration amplitudes do not decrease gradually with the increased inclination angles in $X$ and $Y$direction. When the inclination angle is 5° and 20°, the vibration values of the seedmetering device are similar in $X$direction. When the inclination angle is 20°, the vibration amplitude reaches the maximum value in $Y$direction.
Fig. 9. Vibration amplitudes of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$direction
a) Vibration amplitudes in $X$direction
b) Vibration amplitudes in $Y$direction
Fig. 10. Vibration amplitudes of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$direction
a) Vibration amplitudes in $X$direction
b) Vibration amplitudes in $Y$direction
4.4. Impacts of excitation source position on the vibration of the seedmetering device
The excitation source position is changed within 300 mm600 mm, and the step length is 100 mm. The vibration of the seedmetering device under 4 working conditions is computed. Results are shown in Fig. 11. It is shown in Fig. 11(a) that in $X$ direction of the vibration plate, the vibration is stronger when the observation point is farther from the excitation source in the same position. The phenomenon is caused by that shaking of supporting legs far from the excitation source could easily cause problems such as distortion and resonance, leading to serious vibration. It is shown in Fig. 11(b) that the vibration in $Y$ direction presents an approximate symmetric distribution with the excitation source as the center, where the vibration far from the excitation source is serious gradually. The weakest vibration is at the position directly facing the excitation source in the same excitation source position. The phenomenon is caused by constraints of supporting legs and lateral baffles along two ends of the vibration plate in $Y$direction, so the vibration plate gets deformed, but the strength is much weaker compared with the tail end in $X$direction. In addition, under the working condition of the same distance, the vibration amplitudes gradually increased with the increased excitation source position in $X$ and $Y$direction.
Fig. 11. Vibration amplitudes of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$direction
a) Vibration amplitudes in $X$direction
b) Vibration amplitudes in $Y$direction
4.5. Impacts of thickness of supporting legs on the vibration of the seedmetering device
Thickness of supporting legs is changed within 3 mm6 mm, and the step length is 1 mm. The vibration of the seedmetering device under 4 working conditions is computed. Results are shown in Fig. 12. It is shown in Fig. 12(a) that in $X$ direction of the vibration plate, the vibration is stronger when the observation point is farther from the excitation source in the same thickness of supporting legs. The phenomenon is caused by that shaking of supporting legs far from the excitation source could easily cause problems including distortion and resonance, leading to serious vibration. It is shown in Fig. 12(b) that the vibration in $Y$ direction presents an approximate symmetric distribution with the excitation source as the center, where the vibration far from the excitation source is serious gradually. The weakest vibration is at the position directly facing the excitation source in the same thickness of supporting legs.
The phenomenon is caused by constraints of supporting legs and lateral baffles along two ends of the vibration plate in $Y$direction, so the vibration plate gets deformed, but the strength is much weaker compared with the tail end in $X$direction. In addition, under the working condition with the same distance, the vibration amplitude of the seedmetering device does not decrease with the increased supporting leg thickness. When the supporting leg thickness is 6 mm, the valley positions of the vibration curve are different from other working conditions in $Y$direction.
Fig. 12. Vibration amplitudes of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$direction
a) Vibration amplitudes in $X$direction
b) Vibration amplitudes in $Y$direction
4.6. Strains of the seedmetering device under different parameters
Strains with different parameters including the plate thickness, inclination angle, excitation source position and supporting leg thickness are extracted respectively, as shown in Fig. 13. It is shown in the figure that the strain of supporting legs with different parameters is obviously different. The strain also presents obvious differences at connecting positions of each component of the seedmetering device. Therefore, parameters including the plate thickness, inclination angle, excitation source position and supporting leg thickness cause serious impacts on the vibration of the seedmetering device, which will further affect the sowing performance of the seedmetering device.
Fig. 13. Strains of the seedmetering device with different parameters
a) Vibration plate thickness
b) Inclination angle
c) Excitation source position
d) Supporting leg thickness
5. Multiobjective optimization for the vibration of the seedmetering device
For most machines and structures, the vibration is a passive and harmful phenomenon which will reduce the machine accuracy, increase additional dynamic stress in structures and seriously shorten the service life of structures. However, the vibration is beneficial under some cases and can be applied. In the paper, the vibration is used for ordered sowing. When the vibration is small, the population motion has a small motion speed and poor liquidity, and the repeated suction rate of seed suction holes is relatively high. When the vibration is very serious, the population motion speed is large, and seed suction of the seed suction holes is difficult. Additionally, the suction missing rate is relatively high. Proper vibrations can relatively reduce the suction missing rate and repeated suction rate of the seed suction holes. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the vibration of the plate of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$ direction, which is a multiobjective optimization problem. In the multiobjective optimization, multiple objectives are mutually restrained and highly nonlinear, so it is nearly impossible to obtain optimal solutions for all the objectives. Therefore, these parameters must be optimized at the same time, so the multiobjective optimization of the vibration can be achieved. In other words, an optimization method must be applied to select system parameters of the seedmetering device rationally to improve the vibration performance.
Analysis in Section 4 shows that the plate thickness, inclination angle, excitation source position and supporting leg thickness of the seedmetering device have serious impacts on the vibration. Therefore, these parameters are taken as design variables. Optimization of the vibration of the seedmetering device in $X$ and $Y$ direction is taken as the objective, and set as $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}\left(f\right)$. During optimization, it must be ensured that the firstorder vibration frequency of the seedmetering device will not be increased because the increased frequency will affect working performance. Therefore, the constraint function is that the firstorder frequency is less than 6.25 Hz, namely $f\left(\right)\le 6.25$ Hz. Its mathematical model is as follows:
where: ${f}_{1}$ is the spatial mean value of the vibration displacement of the seedmetering device in $X$direction; ${f}_{2}$ is the spatial mean value of the vibration displacement of the seedmetering device in $Y$direction. $f$ is the firstorder frequency of the seedmetering device. ${x}_{i}$ is the design variable; ${x}_{i}^{\left(l\right)}$ is the lower limit of design variables; ${x}_{i}^{\left(u\right)}$ is the upper limit of design variables. Related parameter values are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Upper and lower limits of optimization design variables of the seedmetering device
Parameters

Original values

Upper limit

Lower limit

Vibration plate thickness ${x}_{1}$

4 mm

7.0 mm

2.5 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 1 ${x}_{2}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

1.5 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 2 ${x}_{3}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

1.5 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 3 ${x}_{4}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

1.5 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 4 ${x}_{5}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

1.5 mm

Vibration plate inclination ${x}_{6}$

10°

5°

20°

Excitation source position ${x}_{7}$

400 mm

300 mm

600 mm

Immune optimization algorithms are an intelligent method which is used to solve optimization problems based on simulation of mechanisms such as immune recognition, immune response and immune memory of a biological immunity system. If an optimization problem and its constraint are deemed as antigens and candidate solutions of the target problem are deemed as antibodies. The immune recognition and immune response processes of the biological immune system can be associated with the search of optimization problem solution space based on the immune optimization algorithm. Fig. 14 describes the search of the optimization solution space based on an immune optimization algorithm. It is shown in the figure that iterations of the immune optimization algorithm mainly include 3 steps: clone operation, immune genetic operation and selection operation.
Fig. 14. Topological structures of the traditional immune algorithm
In addition, the traditional immune algorithm has some serious defects, namely it can easily fall into the balanced status of local optimization and the search will be terminated at the later stage of evolution. As a result, final search results of the algorithm are often the local optimal solutions rather than the global optimal solutions. In order to improve the immune algorithm and avoid premature convergence, the paper proposes a novel multilayer immune algorithm based on genetic algorithms (MLIGA). The model is divided into an upper layer and a lower layer. The antibody subpopulation on the lower layer and the antibody subpopulation on the upper layer are organized in the form shown in Fig. 15. There are $NN$ subpopulations in the lowerlayer antibody, and each subpopulation has $m$ antibodies. A population is divided into multiple subpopulations, so diversity of individuals in the population can be maintained effectively, and defects including premature convergence and high sensitivity to problem scale can be avoided effectively. Through using the competitiontype coevolution, the convergence speed and convergence accuracy of each lowerlayer subpopulation can be increased effectively. Through upgrade, lowerlayer subpopulations are upgraded to the higher layer in order to constitute a higherlayer antibody subpopulation. A parallel genetic algorithm based on collaborative cooperation is used for operations on the higher layer. The information communication and cooperation are achieved through the individual migration. Through the updating, subpopulations are updated to corresponding lowerlayer subpopulations.
Fig. 15. Topological structures of the proposed MLIGA algorithm
MLIGA algorithm applies concepts including immunity, genetics and collaborative evolution to combined optimization. Its processes are shown in Fig. 16. Firstly, the optimization model, population scale, antibody number and iteration times, crossover probability, mutation probability and so forth are initialized. Next, path length values corresponding to each antibody in the subpopulation are computed. Therefore, the shortest path value of the subpopulation is obtained. In the MLIGA algorithm, lowerlayer operations based on immune clone selection and higherlayer operations based on genetic algorithm are taken as a seriesconnection hybrid form. An embedded hybrid form is used for lowerlayer and higherlayer operations. Collaborate competition mechanism is embedded into the immunecloneselection algorithm in the lowerlayer operations. The collaborative cooperation mechanism is embedded into genetic algorithm in the higherlayer operations.
With continuous development of some software, good interfaces have been established between different software. Therefore, the commercial software can be integrated into MATLAB for cosimulation. Product models can be modified through modifying design parameters. In this way, simulation software can be operated automatically, and geometric model parameters can be modified automatically. During optimization using the MATLAB software, the MLIGA optimization algorithm is implanted through secondary development. MATLAB software will modify input parameters of all the integrated software, call solution software to solve them, read the response results and finally judge whether the response results are optimal. The optimization will be ended if the optimal solution is obtained. Otherwise, the parameters will be modified and responses will be solved and read again. The process is repeated till the ideal objective function value is obtained.
Fig. 16. Optimization processes of the proposed MLIGA method
In order to further verify validity of the MLIGA model for optimizing the vibration of the seedmetering device, it is compared with the traditional GA model and PSOGA model. Predicted errors of three kinds of optimization algorithms are shown in Fig. 17. In order to ensure rigor of analysis, three kinds of algorithms adopt populations with the same scale, while a set critical error or iteration number is set as the termination condition. In the optimization, 0.01 is set as the critical error, and the maximum iteration number is 600. It is shown in Fig. 17 that errors of GA model, PSOGA model and MLIGA model are 0.145, 0.092 and 0.043 respectively when the iteration is conducted to 81th generation, where all the errors are more than the set critical error 0.01. At this moment, the optimization iteration still proceeded. When the iteration is conducted to the 156th generation, the error of the MLIGA model is 0.0098 and smaller than the set critical value 0.01, and the optimization iteration is convergent. At this moment, errors of the GA model and PSOGA model are 0.125 and 0.065 respectively, far more than the critical error. Therefore, the optimization iteration will keep on proceeding. When the iteration of PSOGA model is continued to the 315th generation, the error is 0.0099, smaller than the set critical value 0.01. Therefore, the optimization iteration is convergent. However, at this moment, the iteration error of GA model is 0.085, still more than the set critical error. In addition, the GA model falls into local extremes when the iteration is conducted to 138th265th generation and jumps out from the local extremes after a long time. When the iteration is conducted to the 600th generation, iteration of the GA model is ended, and the error is 0.018 at this moment. The value is still more than the set critical error. When the iteration of the MLIGA model is conducted to the 156th generation, the predicted error is smaller than the set critical error. Compared with other two kinds of algorithms, the optimization accuracy is increased and the time is reduced. Finally, original vibration amplitudes in $X$ and $Y$ directions are 1.684 mm and 1.328 mm, respectively. Regarding optimization of the GA model, the vibration amplitudes in $X$ and $Y$ direction are 1.726 mm and 1.384 mm respectively. Obviously, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 2.49 % and 4.22 % respectively. Regarding optimization of the PSOGA model, the vibration amplitudes in $X$ and $Y$ direction are 1.848 mm and 1.408 mm respectively. Obviously, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 9.74% and 6.024 % respectively. Regarding optimization of the MLIGA model, the vibration amplitudes in $X$ and $Y$ direction are 1.976 mm and 1.418 mm respectively. Obviously, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 17.34 % and 6.78 % respectively. Optimized structure parameters and results are shown in Table 2. Obviously, structures with better performance can be obtained through using the proposed MLIGA model.
Fig. 17. Iteration processes of three kinds of optimization algorithms
Table 2. Related results of the seedmetering device before and after optimization
Parameters

Original values

Optimized values

Vibration plate thickness ${x}_{1}$

4 mm

7.0 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 1 ${x}_{2}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 2 ${x}_{3}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 3 ${x}_{4}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

Thickness of supporting leg 4 ${x}_{5}$

3 mm

6.0 mm

Vibration plate inclination ${x}_{6}$

10°

5°

Excitation source position ${x}_{7}$

400 mm

300 mm

Vibration amplitude in $X$ direction ${f}_{1}$

1.684 mm

1.976 mm

Vibration amplitude in $Y$ direction ${f}_{2}$

1.328 mm

1.425 mm

Firstorder vibration frequency $f$

6.25 Hz

6.18 Hz

6. Conclusions
In order to improve the immune algorithm and avoid premature convergence, the paper proposes a novel multilayer immune algorithm based on genetic algorithms (MLIGA). The model is divided into an upper layer and a lower layer. The antibody subpopulation on the lower layer and the antibody subpopulation on the upper layer are organized. A population is divided into multiple subpopulations, so diversity of individuals in the population can be maintained effectively. The search characteristics of the traditional genetic algorithm are maintained. Finally, the proposed MLIGA method is applied to a multiobjective optimization for the vibration of seedmetering devices. The structure with optimal performance is obtained.
1) The working point of the seedmetering device is inevitably located around the resonance frequency of the low order, where the firstorder frequency was 6.25 Hz. The firstorder mode is mainly reflected by horizontal reciprocating motion of the vibration plate caused by bending vibration of supporting legs. In this way, motion of seeds can be motivated. It is a working vibration mode of the seedmetering device. The secondorder mode is reflected by the secondorder bending vibration of supporting legs and the vertical vibration of the vibration plate. Most serious vibration is mainly distributed at the center of the vibration plate. Modes of other orders are mainly reflected by local vertical vibration of the vibration plate and bending vibration of supporting legs.
2) Frequencydomain results have an obvious peak around 6.25 Hz, which is caused by fundamental frequency of the seedmetering device. In addition, obvious peaks are around 25 Hz, 50 Hz, 82 Hz and 150 Hz as the excitation source has obvious peaks at these frequencies. In addition, some extra peaks are also in the frequencydomain results, which are caused by structural resonance of the seedmetering device. Obviously, frequencydomain displacement peaks at supporting legs of the seedmetering device are mainly caused by overlaying of natural frequencies of the excitation source and the structure.
3) Variation tendencies of the vibration displacements are completely consistent in $X$ and $Y$ directions. The maximum difference of vibration displacements in $X$direction is 5.1 %, and the maximum difference of vibration displacements in $Y$direction is 1.5 %. Obviously, the numerical simulation has a high accuracy and can replace the experimental test.
4) Regarding parameters including the plate thickness, inclination angle, excitation source position and supporting leg thickness, in the same condition, the vibration in $X$ direction is stronger when the observation point is farther from the excitation source. It is caused by that shaking of supporting legs far from the excitation source could easily cause problems including distortion and resonance, leading to serious vibration. The vibration in $Y$ direction presents an approximate symmetric distribution with the excitation source as the center. The vibration far from the excitation source is serious gradually, and the weakest vibration is at the position directly facing the excitation source. The phenomenon is caused by constraints of supporting legs and lateral baffles along two ends of the plate in $Y$direction. Therefore, the plate gets deformed, but the strength is much weaker compared with the tail end in $X$direction. Parameters including the plate thickness, inclination angle, excitation source position and supporting leg thickness have serious impacts on the vibration of the seedmetering device.
5) In order to further verify validity of the novel MLIGA model for optimizing the vibration performance of the seedmetering device, it is compared with the traditional GA model and PSOGA model. In order to ensure rigor of analysis, three kinds of algorithms adopt populations with the same scale. A set critical error or iteration number is set as the termination condition. When the iteration of the MLIGA model is conducted to the 156th generation, the predicted error is smaller than the set critical error. Compared with other two kinds of algorithms, the optimized time is reduced. Regarding optimization of the GA model, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 2.49 % and 4.22 % respectively. Regarding optimization of the PSOGA model, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 9.74 % and 6.024 % respectively. Regarding optimization of the MLIGA model, the vibration amplitudes are increased by 17.34 % and 6.78 % respectively. Obviously, structures with better performance can be obtained through using the novel MLIGA model.
References
 Anantachar M., Kumar P. G. V., Guruswamy T. Neural network prediction of performance parameters of an inclined plate seed metering device and its reverse mapping for the determination of optimum design and operational parameters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 72, Issue 2, 2010, p. 8798. [Search CrossRef]
 St Jack D., Hesterman D. C., Guzzomi A. L. Precision metering of santalum spicatum (Australian Sandalwood) seeds. Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 115, Issue 2, 2013, p. 171183. [Search CrossRef]
 Zhan Z., Yafang W., Jianjun Y., et al. Monitoring method of rice seeds mass in vibrating tray for vacuumpanel precision seeder. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 114, 2015, p. 2531. [Search CrossRef]
 Yazgi A., Degirmencioglu A. Measurement of seed spacing uniformity performance of a precision metering unit as function of the number of holes on vacuum plate. Measurement, Vol. 56, 2014, p. 128135. [Search CrossRef]
 Anantachar M., Kumar G. V. P., Guruswamy T. Development of artificial neural network models for the performance prediction of an inclined plate seed metering device. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11, Issue 4, 2011, p. 37533763. [Search CrossRef]
 Chen J., Li Y. M. Study on seeds movement law in sowing test with suction and vibration. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 33, Issue 1, 2002, p. 4750. [Search CrossRef]
 Zhao L. X., Zheng Y. L., Liu Z. M., et al. Seed vibration performance of vibrational airsucking seeder with airstyle vibrator. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 21, Issue 7, 2005, p. 6568. [Search CrossRef]
 Sun W., Wang G. P., Wu J. M. Design and experiment on loss sowing testing and compensation system of spoonchain potato metering device. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 32, Issue 11, 2016, p. 815. [Search CrossRef]
 Song J. L., Yang Z. D., Yang S. D., et al. A seed metering device of variable hole depth. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, Vol. 32, Issue 12, 2010, p. 103105. [Search CrossRef]
 Liao Q. X., Zhang P. L., Liao Y. T., et al. Numerical simulation on seeding performance of centrifugal rapeseed metering device based on EDEM. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 45, Issue 2, 2014, p. 109114. [Search CrossRef]
 Zhang T., Liu F., Zhao M. Q., Liu Y. Q., Li F. L., et al. Movement law of maize population in seed room of seed metering device based on discrete element method. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 32, Issue 22, 2016, p. 2735. [Search CrossRef]
 Chen C. C., Zhou H. B., Ma X., Zhou L., Zhai T. T. Simulation and analysis of seeding speed for vibrating precision seed meter. Journal of Jiamusi University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2014, p. 408412. [Search CrossRef]
 Hu J. P., Guo K., Zhou C. J., Hou C. Simulation and experiment of supplying seeds in box of magnetic precision cylinderseeder. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 45, Issue 8, 2014, p. 6165. [Search CrossRef]
 Yu Y. X., Li J. M., Shao X. B., Zhao Y. The modal analysis and experimental study on vibration seedmetering device. Journal of Zhejiang SciTech University, Vol. 28, Issue 1, 2011, p. 6972. [Search CrossRef]
 Yu Y. X., Zhang X., Wu F., Liu L. Analysis and test of transverse vibration of vibrating plate of rice seed metering device. Journal of Zhejiang SciTech University, Vol. 33, Issue 1, 2015, p. 7882. [Search CrossRef]
 Liu C. L., Song J. N. Influence of seed tray vibration on work performance of suctionvibration type precision seed device. Journal of China Agricultural University, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 2004, p. 1214. [Search CrossRef]
 An X., Wang S., Duan H., et al. Test on Effect of the operating speed of maizesoybean interplanting seeders on performance of seedermetering devices. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 174, 2017, p. 353359. [Search CrossRef]
 Yu Y. X., Zhao Y., Zhang B., Li G. Seed metering device based on orienting ordered arrangement in embryo and parameter optimization. Journal of Jiangsu University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 29, Issue 3, 2008, p. 194197. [Search CrossRef]
 Yang R. B., Zhang X., Li J. D., Shang S. Q., Chai H. H. Parameter optimization and experiment on cone canvas belt type seedmetering device. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2016, p. 613. [Search CrossRef]
 El Ela A.A.A., Allam S. M., Shatla Maximal M. M. optimal benefits of distributed generation using genetic algorithms. Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 80, Issue 7, 2010, p. 869877. [Search CrossRef]
 Abd El Wahed W.F., Mousa A. A., El Shorbagy M.A. Integrating particle swarm optimization with genetic algorithms for solving nonlinear optimization problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 235, Issue 5, 2011, p. 14461453. [Search CrossRef]
 Korürek M., Doğan B. ECG beat classification using particle swarm optimization and radial basis function neural network. Expert systems with Applications, Vol. 37, Issue 12, 2010, p. 75637569. [Search CrossRef]
 Rashidi M. M., Ali M., Freidoonimehr N., et al. Parametric analysis and optimization of entropy generation in unsteady MHD flow over a stretching rotating disk using artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Energy, Vol. 55, 2013, p. 497510. [Search CrossRef]
 Liu H., Tian H., Chen C., et al. An experimental investigation of two WaveletMLP hybrid frameworks for wind speed prediction using GA and PSO optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 52, 2013, p. 161173. [Search CrossRef]
 Wang P. C., Shoup T. E. A polyhybrid PSO optimization method with intelligent parameter adjustment. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 42, Issue 8, 2011, p. 555565. [Search CrossRef]
 Lau H. C. W., Chan T. M., Tsui W. T., et al. Application of genetic algorithms to solve the multidepot vehicle routing problem. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 2010, p. 383392. [Search CrossRef]
 Hidalgo D., Melin P., Castillo O. An optimization method for designing type2 fuzzy inference systems based on the footprint of uncertainty using genetic algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2012, p. 45904598. [Search CrossRef]
 Hasanien H. M., Muyeen S. M. Design optimization of controller parameters used in variable speed wind energy conversion system by genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2012, p. 200208. [Search CrossRef]
 Hu Z. H. A container multimodal transportation scheduling approach based on immune affinity model for emergency relief. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, Issue 3, 2011, p. 26322639. [Search CrossRef]
 Mobini M., Mobini Z., Rabbani M. An Artificial Immune Algorithm for the project scheduling problem under resource constraints. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2011, p. 19751982. [Search CrossRef]
 Li R., Mita A., Zhou J. Hybrid methodology for structural health monitoring based on immune algorithms and symbolic time series analysis. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 2013, p. 4856. [Publisher]
Articles Citing this One
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
C.M. Pareek, V.K. Tewari, Rajendra Machavaram, Brajesh Nare

2021
