A semianalytical method for vibration analysis of thin spherical shells with elastic boundary conditions
Kun Xie^{1} , Meixia Chen^{2} , Zuhui Li^{3}
^{1, 2, 3}School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, China
^{2}Corresponding author
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 19, Issue 4, 2017, p. 23122330.
https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17154
Received 11 May 2016; received in revised form 28 August 2016; accepted 19 September 2016; published 30 June 2017
JVE Conferences
A semianalytical method is proposed to analyze both axisymmetric and asymmetric vibrations of thin opened spherical shells with elastic boundary conditions and discontinuity in thickness. To establish the governing equation, the method is involved in dividing the shell into many narrow strips in meridional direction, and those strips are approximately treated as conical ones with uniform thickness. Flügge shell theory is used to describe the motions of strips and displacement functions are expanded as power series. Artificial springs are employed to restrain displacements at edges so that arbitrary boundary conditions can be analyzed. By assembling all continuity conditions of adjacent strips and boundary conditions, the governing equation is established. In numerical results discussion, many comparisons of frequency parameters of present method and those in literature are firstly presented and they illustrate high accuracy and wide application of present method. Furthermore, influences of elastic boundary conditions, open angle, ratio of thickness to radius and thickness discontinuity on natural frequencies of spherical shells are investigated. Results show that meridinoal and circumferential displacements have obvious effects on natural frequencies, and the influence of thickness discontinuity seriously depends on the location of discontinuity.
Keywords: opened spherical shells, semianalytical method, elastic boundary conditions, stepwise thickness, free vibration analysis.
1. Introduction
In building roofs, LNG tanks, offshore structures, nuclear power plants and other engineering structures, spherical shells are extensively used. Many times those structures are subjected to various external loads, such as earthquakes and sea waves, and the loads are of serious consequence for the strength and safety. Herein, knowing vibration characteristics plays an important role in design process. To this end, vibrations of spherical shells were investigated in past years and are also attracting attentions of more and more scholars nowadays.
In general, the research method analyzing vibrations of spherical shells can be classified as three categories: analytical method [121], numerical method [2237] and experimental method [38]. For analytical method, selecting appropriate displacement functions is the most important aspect. Although Legendre functions are usually adopted [2, 3, 611, 1315], those functions significantly increase difficulties in solving natural frequencies due to the complex values. Niordson [14, 15] decomposed Legendre functions into real and imagine parts and the frequency equation could be correspondently solved in real number region. However, the form of displacements is uncertain around the critical frequency. Except for Legendre functions, Bessel functions were also used by some scholars, such as Kalnins and Naghdi [1], Hoppmann II [4] and Kalnins [5], to express the displacement functions of spherical shells. However, only shallow spherical shells can be accurately analyzed. Chakrabarti [12] adopted elementary (algebraic) functions to study radial vibrations of spherical shells. Lee [17] employed Chebyshev polynomials and Fourier series to express the displacement functions of spherical caps. Then, Lee [18] used the same method to analyze free vibration a hermetic capsule consisting of one cylindrical shell and two hemispherical shells. Standard Fourier series with auxiliary functions were adopted by Su et al. [19] to express displacement functions of functionally graded spherical shells. Chernobryvko et al. [20] used the eigenmodes of the cantilever beam to approximate eigenmodes of axisymmetric shells and presented natural frequencies of a spherical shell of clampedfree boundary conditions. Excepting twodimensional shell theory, threedimensional method was adopted by Chen and Ding [16] and Kang [21] to study vibrations of multilayered hollow spheres and shallow spherical domes, respectively.
Numerically solving governing equations [22, 23, 3033] and discretizing spherical shell [2429, 3437] are two main numerical methods to analyze vibrations of spherical shells. Zarghamee and Robinson [22] used the Holzer method to analyze free vibrations of spherical shells. Souza and Croll [23] investigated free vibrations of spherical shells by the finite difference method. Artioli and Viola [30] and Tornabene and Viola [31] used the generalized differential quadrature method (GDQ) to evaluate natural frequencies of spherical shells. Simmonds and Hosseinbor [32, 33] adopted a perturbation method to study free and forced vibrations of a closed elastic spherical shell fixed to an equatorial beam. As similar with other shell structures, finite element method [24, 26, 29] and semianalytic finite element method [27] are the most common discrete methods to study vibrations of spherical shells. By using circular arc to represent the generic segment of the shell of revolution, Singh [25] adopted Bezier polynomials to study free vibrations of shells of revolutions. Piecewise Hermite interpolation polynomial and Fourier approximation were used by Wu and Heyliger [28] to expand approximately unknown displacements and forces in azimuthal and circumferential directions, respectively. By combining the modified variational principle with multisegment partitioning procedure, Qu et al. [34] studied free and forced vibrations of functionally graded shells of revolution through adopting Fourier series and polynomials to expand the displacements. Choi et al. [35] used the Sylvestertransfer stiffness coefficient method to study free vibrations of axisymmetric shells. Before establishing the governing equation, axisymmetric shells were divided into lots of narrow strips and those strips were treated approximately as conical shells. Naghsh et al. [36] used the meridional finite strip method to investigate free vibrations of general shells of revolution, and natural frequencies of a spherical shell with constant and linearly variable thickness in the meridional direction were presented. Cui et al. [37] proposed a nodal integration model for elasticstatic, free vibration and forced vibrations of axisymmetric thin shells by using twonode truncated conical elements.
In most above cited literature, the thickness of shell is uniform and only classic boundary conditions are taken into account. However, in practical engineering applications, boundary conditions may not be fixed in a classic restraint, and a variety of boundary conditions, such as elastic ones, may be encountered. In addition, nonuniform thickness, e.g. continuous variational thickness and stepped thickness, is also widely adopted to efficiently improve structural strength without obviously increasing the weight. At this context, proposing an accurate and efficient method for vibration analysis of thin spherical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions and nonuniform thickness is meaningful.
The main purpose of the paper is to present an approach to analyze free vibrations of thin spherical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions and nonuniform thickness. First, the spherical shell is decomposed into lots of narrow strips, which are approximately treated as conical shells. Then, Flügge thin shell theory is employed to describe equations of motions of those conical strips, and displacement functions are expressed as power series. Finally, the governing equation is established through assembling continuity and boundary conditions. Based on the proposed method, effects of elastic boundary conditions, open angles, thickness discontinuity and other parameters on vibration characteristics of spherical shells are investigated. The present method is believed to include following novelties. It offers an accurate and efficient method to investigate free vibrations of spherical shells with elastic boundary conditions. In addition, it is applicable to deal with both uniform and nonuniform thickness. Last but not least, as spherical shells are coupled with thin cylindrical, conical and/or spherical shells, the continuity conditions between spherical shells and other shells can be accurately satisfied by present method. Vibrations of this kind of coupled structures are rarely studied whereas vibrations of coupled cylindricalcylindrical, conicalcylindrical and conicalconical shells have been relatively extensively studied.
2. Theoretical formulations
2.1. Basic concept of the semianalytical method
Fig. 1 shows the schematic diagram of a spherical shell with two open angles. The thickness may be constant, stepwise or continuous variational. $\phi $ and $\theta $ denote the azimuthal and circumferential coordinates in spherical coordinate system. ${\phi}_{0}$ and ${\phi}_{1}$ are the azimuth angles of two edges. In order to establish the governing equation of the spherical shell, the shell is divided into many narrow strips along the short dash lines in Fig. 1(b), and the strips are approximately treated as conical shells. Meanwhile, the thickness of any narrow strip, which may be variational, can be equivalently dealt as constant one when the strips are narrow enough. Radii of two ends of the strip are same as the radii of two circles of edges of the corresponding strip, and the axial length is the axial distance between the two circles. Then, on the basis of Flügge thin shell theory, power series are adopted to expand displacements of conical shells. Consequently, for a particular circumferential mode number, displacements and forces at the crosssection of one strip can be expressed in terms of eight unknown coefficients. Lastly, four continuity conditions of displacements and four equilibrium equations of forces of adjacent two strips are used to assemble those strips to the spherical shell. With the help of boundary conditions, the final governing equation analyzing vibrations of spherical shells is established.
If north and/or south poles are included in the spherical shell, the poles should be cut so that the strip closing to the pole can be treated as truncated conical shells. In addition, the hole must be small enough to avoid big errors. In the following analysis, the azimuth angle of edge is $\phi =$0.1° for the north pole while the azimuth angle of edge is $\phi =$179.9° for the south pole. At those added edges, free boundary conditions are adopted.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a spherical shell with two edges
a)
b)
c)
2.2. Equations of motion of conical shells
The local coordinate system, displacements and forces of a conical shell are shown in Fig. 2. $x$ is the meridional coordinate and it’s measured from the middle of the strip. $\theta $ is the circumferential coordinate and it’s same with that of the spherical shell. ${R}_{1}$ and ${R}_{2}$ are the radii of small and large ends, respectively. ${R}_{0}$ is the mean radius and $R$ is the radius at $x$. $\alpha $ is the semivertex angle. $u$, $v$ and $w$ are the displacements in meridional, circumferential and normal directions. $\beta =\partial w/\partial x$ denotes the slope. $M$ is the bending moment resultant, $N$ is the meridional force resultant, and $\stackrel{}{S}$ and $\stackrel{}{N}$ are the normal and circumferential KelvinKirchhoff shear force resultants, respectively.
Fig. 2. Local coordinate system, displacements and forces of a conical shell
By utilization of Flügge shell theory, equations of motion of a conical shell are [39]:
${L}_{21}u+{L}_{22}v+{L}_{23}w\rho h\frac{{\partial}^{2}v}{\partial {t}^{2}}=0,$
${L}_{31}u+{L}_{32}v+{L}_{33}w\rho h\frac{{\partial}^{2}w}{\partial {t}^{2}}=0,$
where $h$ and $\rho $ are the thickness and density, respectively. Differential operators ${L}_{ij}$ ($i$, $j=$1, 2, 3) can refer to Ref. [40].
For a given circumferential mode number, power series are employed to express displacement functions [41]:
$v\left(x,\theta ,t\right)=\sum _{p=0}^{\infty}{b}_{n,p}{x}^{p}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\left(n\theta \right){e}^{j\omega t},$
$w\left(x,\theta ,t\right)=\sum _{p=0}^{\infty}{c}_{n,p}{x}^{p}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\left(n\theta \right){e}^{j\omega t}.$
In Eq. (2), the recurrence relations of ${a}_{n,p}$, ${b}_{n,p}$, ${c}_{n,p}$ have been detailedly deduced in the authors’ recently opened paper [40]. With the help of the recurrence relations, only eight unknown coefficients, ${a}_{n,0}$, ${a}_{n,1}$, ${b}_{n,0}$, ${b}_{n,1}$, ${c}_{n,0}$, ${c}_{n,1}$, ${c}_{n,2}$, ${c}_{n,3}$, exist in the displacement functions. Omitting subscript $n$, the displacement functions can be further expressed as:
$v\left(x,\theta ,t\right)=\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{x}\cdot \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\left(n\theta \right){e}^{j\omega t},$
$w\left(x,\theta ,t\right)=\mathbf{w}\cdot \mathbf{x}\cdot \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\left(n\theta \right){e}^{j\omega t},$
where the vectors $\mathbf{u}$, $\mathbf{v}$, $\mathbf{w}$ and $\mathbf{x}$ are:
and
In Eq. (4), ${u}_{i}\left(x\right)$, ${v}_{i}\left(x\right)$ and ${w}_{i}\left(x\right)$ ($i=$ 18) are the base functions.
It must be mentioned that only torsionless axisymmetric modes $(u\ne 0$, $w\ne 0$, $v=0)$, namely breathing modes, are accounted for in the following analysis. In addition, in view of differences of semivertex angles of two adjacent strips, displacements and forces will be considered in the cylindrical coordinate system. Correspondingly, four notations about some displacements and forces are introduced and they are:
$\stackrel{~}{N}=N\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}{\alpha}_{i}\stackrel{}{S}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}{\alpha}_{i},\stackrel{~}{\stackrel{}{S}}=\stackrel{}{S}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}{\alpha}_{i}+N\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}{\alpha}_{i},$
where ${\alpha}_{i}$ is the semivertex angle of the $i$th strip, $\stackrel{~}{u}$ and $\stackrel{~}{w}$ are the axial and radial displacements, and $\stackrel{~}{N}$ and $\stackrel{~}{\stackrel{}{S}}$ denote axial and radical force resultants, rather than meridional and normal ones.
Substituting the functions of displacements into the expressions of slope and forces (Expressions of force resultants in terms of displacements are given in the Appendix), four displacements and four forces at the crosssection can be expressed as:
where
In Eqs. (8) and (9), the detailed expressions of ${\mathrm{\Phi}}_{i}$, which represents ${\stackrel{~}{u}}_{i}$, ${v}_{i}$, ${\stackrel{~}{w}}_{i}$, ${\beta}_{i}$, ${\stackrel{~}{N}}_{i}$, ${\stackrel{}{T}}_{i}$, ${\stackrel{~}{\stackrel{}{S}}}_{i}$ and ${M}_{i}$, can be readily obtained and they are not given for the sake of brevity.
2.3. Boundary and continuity conditions
After all strips have been analyzed individually, the strips can be assembled through the continuity conditions. Fig. 3 shows the displacements and forces at the $i$th junction, namely the junction between the $i$th strip and ($i+1$)th strip. The continuity conditions of displacements and equilibrium equations of forces are:
where $L$ and $R$ represent edges of adjacent strips at left side and right side of the $i$th junction, respectively.
Besides continuity conditions, boundary conditions are also indispensable. Artificial springs are employed to restrain the displacements at the ends, and corresponding equations are:
where, plus sign indicates boundary condition at $\phi ={\phi}_{1}$ while minus sign indicates boundary condition at $\phi ={\phi}_{0}$. ${K}_{u}^{}$, ${K}_{v}^{}$, ${K}_{w}^{}$ and ${K}_{\beta}^{}$ are stiffness constants of artificial springs restraining meridional, circumferential and normal displacements and slop, respectively.
By assigning appropriate values of stiffness constants of artificial springs, both classic and elastic boundary conditions can be analyzed. In the following analysis, the stiffness constant is set as 0 if the corresponding displacement is free or is assigned as a large value (10^{16} N/m) if the corresponding one is fixed, e.g. ${K}_{u}^{}={K}_{v}^{}={K}_{w}^{}={K}_{\beta}^{}=0$ for free boundaries $\left(\mathbf{F}\right)\text{,}$${K}_{u}^{}={K}_{v}^{}={K}_{w}^{}={K}_{\beta}^{}=$10^{16} N/m for clamped boundaries $\left(\mathbf{C}\right)\text{,}$ and ${K}_{u}^{}={K}_{\beta}^{}=$ 0 and ${K}_{v}^{}={K}_{w}^{}=$10^{16} N/m for hinged boundaries ($\mathbf{H}$).
Fig. 3. Displacements and forces of adjacent strips
2.4. Final governing equation
Assuming that a spherical shell is decomposed into $P$ individual narrow strips, 8$P$ unknown coefficients need to be solved for a given circumferential mode number. The final governing equation, Eq. (13), can be obtained by assembling all continuity conditions and boundary conditions in matrix form:
where $\mathbf{X}={\left[[{\mathbf{x}}_{1}{]}^{T},[{\mathbf{x}}_{2}{]}^{T},...,[{\mathbf{x}}_{P}{]}^{T}\right]}^{T}$ is a $8P\times 1$ vector of the unknown coefficients of all strips, and the expression of $K$ is:
where ${l}_{i}(i=1:P)$ is the meridional length of the $i$th strip. By assigning appropriate dimension and material parameters of the corresponding strip, values of the elements in $\left[{\mathbf{D}}_{i}\right]$ and $\left[{\mathbf{F}}_{i}\right]$ are obtained through Eqs. (8, 9). $\left[{\mathbf{B}}_{1}\right]$ and $\left[{\mathbf{B}}_{P}\right]$ depend on the boundary conditions of two edges, and the general expressions are:
where $\left[{\mathbf{T}}^{s}\right]$ is the matrix about stiffness constants of artificial springs, $\left[{\mathbf{T}}^{c}\right]$ denotes the transformation matrix about the notations introduced in Eq. (6), and their detailed expressions are:
Keeping circumferential number $n$ unchanged, $\omega $ is increased in an appropriately small step until the sign of the determinant of matrix $\mathbf{K}$ changes, and corresponding eigenvalue is roughly obtained. Decreasing the step and repeating the same process, the eigenvalue, namely natural frequency, can be trapped with the desired accuracy. Meanwhile, substituting the eigenvalue back into Eq. (13) and setting one coefficient in vector $\mathbf{X}$ to 1, all the other coefficients can be solved and the corresponding mode shape can be obtained.
3. Numerical results and discussion
In the following analysis, all natural frequencies are expressed as frequency parameters, $\mathrm{\Omega}=\omega R\sqrt{(1{\upsilon}^{2})\rho /E}$.
3.1. Convergence and validity
First, the convergence of present method for asymmetric vibrations of a clamped spherical shell with different open angles and ratios of thickness to radius is discussed. Before convergence analysis, a notation, $\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $, is introduced and it denotes the difference of azimuth angles of two edges of one strip, as shown in Fig. 1. For the sake of brevity, the value of $\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $ is constant for one kind of decomposition, and different values of $\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $ essentially indicate different numbers of strips, e.g. $\mathrm{\Delta}\phi =$1° denotes 60 strips as ${\phi}_{1}=$ 60° and 90 strips as ${\phi}_{1}=$ 90°. The influence of the number of strips on frequency parameters is listed in Table 1, and Fig. 4 shows some mode shapes. In the table, $m$ denotes mode number in meridional direction. As $\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $ decreases, frequency parameters rapidly converge, and the ones of $\mathrm{\Delta}\phi =$ 0.5° satisfy the requirement of convergence. More importantly, the difference of frequency parameters of present method and those in the literature is negligible, which demonstrates high accuracy of present method. Furthermore, although the thin shell theory is adopted, present method can still predict accurately natural frequencies as the ratio of thickness to radius $h/R$ reaches 0.05.
Fig. 4. Asymmetric mode shapes and frequency parameters ${\mathrm{\Omega}}_{nm}$ of the spherical shell with different open angles
The convergence of frequency parameters of axisymmetric modes of a clamped spherical shell is presented in Table 2. Compared with asymmetric modes, the rate of convergence for axisymmetric modes is slower. Some axisymmetric mode shapes are shown in Fig. 5, and it’s seen that the amplitudes of mode shapes have obvious variation at the region closing to the pole, which explains why more strips are required to satisfy the requirement of convergence. It’s further observed that the convergence rate of frequency parameter of the spherical shell with ${\phi}_{1}=$ 30° is obviously slower than the others, which is mainly attributed to higher frequency parameters and similar variations of amplitudes at much smaller region for the same meridional mode. Last but most important, excellent agreement of frequency parameters of present method and literature is observed. That’s to say the axisymmetric vibrations can be also accurately analyzed by present method.
Table 1. Convergence of frequency parameters of asymmetric modes of a clamped spherical shell with different open angles (${\phi}_{0}=$0°, $\upsilon =$ 0.3)
$\frac{h}{R}$

$n$

$m$

${\phi}_{1}=$ 60°

${\phi}_{1}=$ 90°


$\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $

Ref. [11]

Ref. [24]

$\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $

Ref. [11]

Ref. [24]


3°

1°

0.5°

3°

1°

0.5°


0.05

1

1

0.919

0.863

0.858

0.859

0.858

0.589

0.566

0.564

0.564

0.563

2

1.304

1.170

1.166

1.087

1.154

0.936

0.906

0.904

0.905

0.903


2

1

1.034

1.034

1.034

1.034

1.029

0.879

0.879

0.879

0.879

0.879


2

1.142

1.440

1.438

1.125

1.408

1.028

1.027

1.027

1.059

1.029


3

1

1.170

1.170

1.170

1.184

1.158

0.962

0.962

0.962

0.961

0.959


2

1.764

1.764

1.744

1.307

1.684

1.145

1.144

1.144

1.180

1.136


0.02

1

1

0.868

0.788

0.832

0.833

0.832

0.580

0.530

0.548

0.548

0.548

2

1.002

0.941

0.961

0.962

0.961

0.875

0.843

0.863

0.863

0.863


2

1

0.950

0.950

0.950

0.950

0.949

0.863

0.863

0.863

0.863

0.862


2

1.052

1.051

1.051

1.085

1.050

0.937

0.937

0.937

0.936

0.936


3

1

0.990

0.990

0.990

0.991

0.990

0.914

0.914

0.914

0.915

0.914


2

1.130

1.130

1.130

1.157

1.127

0.977

0.977

0.977

0.977

0.977


0.01

1

1

0.851

0.820

0.827

0.827

0.827

0.599

0.539

0.542

0.542

0.542

2

0.941

0.924

0.928

0.928

0.928

0.860

0.850

0.852

0.852

0.853


2

1

0.930

0.929

0.930

0.925

0.930

0.860

0.860

0.860

0.860

0.860


2

0.981

0.981

0.981

0.981

0.981

0.922

0.922

0.922

0.922

0.922


3

1

1.062

0.952

0.952

0.949

0.952

0.904

0.904

0.904

0.908

0.904


2

1.010

1.010

1.010

1.006

1.010

0.944

0.944

0.944

0.944

0.944

Table 2. Convergence of frequency parameters of axisymmetric modes of a clamped spherical shell with three different open angles (${\phi}_{0}=$0°, $h/R=$0.01, $v=$ 0.3)
$m$

${\phi}_{1}=$ 30°

${\phi}_{1}=$60°

${\phi}_{1}=$ 90°


$\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $

Ref.
[13]

$\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $

Ref.
[13]

$\mathrm{\Delta}\phi $

Ref.
[13]


1°

0.5°

0.25°

1°

0.5°

0.25°

1°

0.5°

0.25°


1

1.132

1.017

0.999

0.998

0.881

0.868

0.868

0.868

0.734

0.726

0.726

0.725

2

1.380

1.305

1.260

1.260

0.973

0.953

0.950

0.950

0.903

0.895

0.895

0.895

3

1.744

1.583

1.536

1.537

1.068

1.026

1.017

1.017

0.949

0.939

0.939

0.939

4

2.358

2.085

1.948

1.948

1.211

1.151

1.131

1.131

0.992

0.976

0.973

0.973

5

3.349

3.012

2.770

2.772

1.434

1.341

1.307

1.308

1.053

1.028

1.021

1.022

To further illustrate high accuracy and wide application of present method, more comprehensive comparisons of frequency parameters are tabulated in Table 3. A spherical shell with four kinds of open angles, three different ratios of thickness to radius and two different boundary conditions are considered. It’s observed that, as the ratio of thickness to radius is small, e.g. $h/R=$0.005 and $h/R=$0.01, frequency parameters of present method coincide exactly with the ones in literature for all four kinds of open angles. As $h/R$ increases to 0.05, obvious differences can be found for some modes if open angle ${\phi}_{1}$ is small. It’s further found that, for the same circumferential and meridional mode numbers, frequency parameters of the spherical shell with small open angle are obvious larger than those of the spherical shell with large open angle. In addition, classical thin shell theory is employed by present paper while the firstorder shear deformation theory is used in [24], and differences of those two theories are negligible at low frequency. All those mentioned reasons lead to obvious differences for some modes when $h/R$ is 0.05. From Table 3, it can be also observed that frequency parameters of the shell with clamped boundary conditions are expectedly larger than those of the shell with hinged boundary conditions, and the frequency parameters increase as the ratio of thickness to radius increases.
Table 3. Comparison of frequency parameters of a spherical shell with different open angles and boundary conditions (${\phi}_{0}=$0°, $v=$0.3)
${\phi}_{1}$

$n$

$m$

$\mathbf{C}$

$\mathbf{H}$


$h/R=$0.005

$h/R=$0.01

$h/R=$0.05

$h/R=$0.005

$h/R=$0.01

$h/R=$0.05


Ref.
[24]

Present

Ref.
[24]

Present

Ref.
[24]

Present

Ref.
[24]

Present

Ref.
[24]

Present

Ref.
[24]

Present


30°

1

1

0.968

0.964

1.003

1.001

1.416

1.450

0.963

0.959

1.003

1.001

1.211

1.222

2

1.037

1.042

1.161

1.165

2.949

3.231

1.037

1.043

1.107

1.110

2.506

2.668


3

1.155

1.137

1.572

1.575

3.843

3.886

1.113

1.095

1.435

1.436

3.838

3.861


2

1

0.993

0.993

1.054

1.055

1.954

2.061

0.989

0.990

1.050

1.050

1.627

1.679


2

1.086

1.087

1.319

1.323

3.952

4.504

1.080

1.080

1.233

1.236

3.437

3.781


3

1.266

1.268

1.868

1.883

5.878

5.917

1.208

1.209

1.700

1.711

5.822

5.916


3

1

1.017

1.017

1.125

1.126

2.625

2.857

1.017

1.017

1.102

1.103

2.209

2.345


2

1.146

1.147

1.518

1.526

4.995

5.902

1.124

1.124

1.400

1.405

4.447

5.063


3

1.397

1.399

2.202

2.226

7.594

7.669

1.321

1.322

2.008

2.025

7.205

7.669


45°

1

1

0.921

0.920

0.927

0.926

1.020

1.023

0.920

0.919

0.926

0.926

0.973

0.974

2

0.958

0.958

0.986

0.987

1.589

1.643

0.958

0.958

0.977

0.978

1.403

1.430


3

0.992

0.987

1.097

1.096

2.508

2.579

0.985

0.980

1.060

1.059

2.350

2.465


2

1

0.947

0.947

0.969

0.970

1.233

1.250

0.944

0.944

0.967

0.967

1.146

1.155


2

0.988

0.988

1.053

1.053

2.054

2.167

0.985

0.985

1.048

1.048

1.812

1.879


3

1.044

1.044

1.202

1.204

3.308

3.647

1.043

1.044

1.155

1.157

2.997

3.245


3

1

0.960

0.960

0.996

0.996

1.497

1.540

0.958

0.958

0.996

0.996

1.354

1.381


2

1.009

1.009

1.107

1.108

2.564

2.763

1.007

1.007

1.092

1.093

2.284

2.417


3

1.077

1.077

1.314

1.318

3.999

4.531

1.074

1.074

1.253

1.256

3.658

4.054


60°

1

1

0.825

0.825

0.827

0.827

0.858

0.858

0.823

0.823

0.823

0.823

0.833

0.833

2

0.918

0.918

0.928

0.928

1.154

1.166

0.915

0.915

0.921

0.921

1.076

1.081


3

0.949

0.948

0.983

0.983

1.679

1.737

0.945

0.944

0.971

0.970

1.548

1.588


2

1

0.922

0.922

0.930

0.930

1.029

1.034

0.919

0.919

0.927

0.927

1.008

1.011


2

0.953

0.953

0.981

0.981

1.408

1.438

0.951

0.951

0.981

0.981

1.292

1.310


3

0.982

0.982

1.042

1.043

2.084

2.197

0.980

0.980

1.035

1.035

1.901

1.980


3

1

0.937

0.937

0.952

0.952

1.158

1.170

0.935

0.935

0.950

0.950

1.113

1.121


2

0.965

0.965

1.010

1.010

1.684

1.744

0.963

0.963

1.010

1.010

1.540

1.580


3

1.001

1.000

1.092

1.092

2.494

2.672

0.998

0.998

1.080

1.081

2.287

2.418


90°

1

1

0.539

0.538

0.542

0.542

0.543

0.564

0.533

0.533

0.535

0.534

0.542

0.542

2

0.848

0.847

0.853

0.852

0.903

0.904

0.842

0.841

0.845

0.844

0.879

0.879


3

0.914

0.913

0.921

0.921

1.095

1.104

0.910

0.911

0.916

0.916

1.054

1.059


2

1

0.859

0.858

0.860

0.860

0.879

0.879

0.857

0.857

0.859

0.859

0.877

0.877


2

0.917

0.917

0.922

0.922

1.024

1.027

0.917

0.917

0.922

0.922

0.997

0.999


3

0.939

0.939

0.952

0.952

1.254

1.273

0.939

0.939

0.951

0.951

1.192

1.204


3

1

0.900

0.900

0.904

0.904

0.959

0.962

0.899

0.899

0.902

0.902

0.957

0.959


2

0.933

0.932

0.944

0.944

1.136

1.144

0.931

0.931

0.943

0.943

1.102

1.108


3

0.950

0.950

0.977

0.977

1.430

1.462

0.949

0.948

0.976

0.976

1.354

1.377

In above analysis, only one edge is considered in the spherical shell. In Table 4, frequency parameters of a spherical shell with one or two free edges are presented. It’s observed that frequency parameters of present method agree well with the ones in [14] for all combinations of open angles ${\phi}_{0}$ and ${\phi}_{1}$. It’s further observed that, for a fixed open angle ${\phi}_{0}$, frequency parameters do not monotonically increase or decrease as open angle ${\phi}_{1}$ increases. The effect of open angle will be particularly investigated in the following.
Fig. 5. Some axisymmetric mode shapes and frequency parameters ${\mathrm{\Omega}}_{0m}$ of the spherical shell with three different open angles
Table 4. Comparison of frequency parameters of a spherical shell with one or two $\mathbf{F}$ boundary conditions ($n=$2, $m=$1, $h/R=$0.01, $v=$0.3)
${\phi}_{\text{1}}$

${\phi}_{0}=\mathrm{}$0°

${\phi}_{0}=$ 30°

${\phi}_{0}=$ 45°

${\phi}_{0}=$ 60°

${\phi}_{0}=$ 75°


Ref. [14]

Present

Ref. [14]

Present

Ref. [14]

Present

Ref. [14]

Present

Ref. [14]

Present


15°

0.23119

0.22999

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

30°

0.06195

0.06134

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

45°

0.02989

0.02950

0.02155

0.02123

–

–

–

–

–

–

60°

0.01884

0.01854

0.01656

0.01624

0.01290

0.01264

–

–

–

–

75°

0.01416

0.01391

0.01337

0.01310

0.01183

0.01153

0.00954

0.00932

–

–

90°

0.01231

0.01211

0.01200

0.01178

0.01121

0.01095

0.00983

0.00957

0.00829

0.00810

105°

0.01238

0.01219

0.01223

0.01204

0.01171

0.01148

0.01049

0.01022

0.00928

0.00902

120°

0.01470

0.01446

0.01461

0.01436

0.01402

0.01374

0.01214

0.01185

0.01049

0.01022

135°

0.02165

0.02117

0.02152

0.02103

0.01922

0.01874

0.01402

0.01374

0.01177

0.01148

150°

0.04395

0.04279

0.04124

0.04013

0.01992

0.02103

0.01461

0.01436

0.01223

0.01204

165°

0.16055

0.15746

0.04394

0.04278

0.02165

0.02116

0.01469

0.01445

0.01236

0.01216

180°

0.70101

0.70106

0.04395

0.04279

0.02165

0.02117

0.01470

0.01446

0.01238

0.01219

Based on above comparisons of frequency parameters of present method and literature, it can be concluded that present semianalytic method can accurately analyze free vibrations of thin opened spherical shells.
3.2. Effects of boundary conditions
Fig. 6 presents effects of boundary conditions on the frequency parameters of a spherical shell with three different open angles. It’s observed that, as circumferential mode number is not less than 2, no matter what boundary conditions are, tendencies of frequency parameter versus circumferential mode number are identical, which means the increase of circumferential mode number leads to the increase of frequency parameter. However, as the circumferential mode number varies from 0 to 2, increasing circumferential mode number may lead to the increase or decrease of frequency parameter, which depends on the boundary conditions, open angle and meridional mode number. It’s also observed that, for a particular circumferential mode number, the frequency parameter of the mode with larger meridional mode number is always larger than the one with small meridional mode number. In addition, for $n=$0 and $n=$1, frequency parameters of $\mathbf{F}$ are larger than the ones of $\mathbf{C}$, which is attributed to that the rigid modes are not considered for $\mathbf{F}$.
Fig. 6. Effects of boundary conditions on frequency parameters of the spherical shell with different open angles ($h/R=$0.01, $v=$0.3, ${\phi}_{0}=$0°): a) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 45°, b) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 90°, c) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 135°
In Fig. 7, influences of elastic boundary conditions on free vibrations of a hemispherical shell are shown. Before analyzing the effects of elastic boundaries, it should be mentioned that only three curves in Fig. 7(a), which results from that the circumferential displacement is always 0 for $n=$0. In addition, every curve denotes that only one displacement is elastically restrained and the other three are fixed. It’s observed that effects of meridional and circumferential displacements are obviously greater than normal displacement and slope. However, with the increase of circumferential mode number, the effect of circumferential displacement becomes greater than meridonal displacement. Meanwhile, influences of normal displacement and slope become obvious as the circumferential mode number varies from 0 to 2. It’s further observed that the appropriate value of stiffness constant, which can significantly affect natural frequencies, is different for different circumferential mode numbers and directions of displacements, which is attributed to different values of stresses.
3.3. Effects of open angle
In Section 3.1, it is pointed out that the open angle has great influence on frequency parameters. In this section, influences of the open angle are discussed in detail. Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 show the effects of the open angle on frequency parameters of the free and clamped spherical shell, respectively. For free boundary conditions, on the one hand, the increase of the open angle can increase the frequency parameter as the open angle is small.
Fig. 7. Effects of stiffness constants on frequency parameters of the hemispherical shell ($m=$1, $h/R=$0.01, $v=$0.3, ${\phi}_{0}=$0°): a) $n=$0, b) $n=$1, c) $n=$2, c) $n=$3
Fig. 8. Effects of open angle on frequency parameters of the spherical shell with free boundary conditions ($h/R=$0.01, $v=$0.3, ${\phi}_{0}=$0°): a) $n=$ 0, b) $n=$1, c) $n=$2, d) $n=$3
On the other hand, for no small open angle, the increase of open angle may lead to the increase or decrease of frequency parameter, which depends on the circumferential and meridional mode numbers. For clamped boundary conditions, with the increase of open angle, the frequency parameter always decreases as the circumferential mode number varies from 0 to 3 and meridional mode number changes from 1 to 3. In addition, as the circumferential mode number increases from 0 to 3, the decrease speed of frequency parameter becomes slower and slower as open angle is larger than 45°.
Fig. 9. Effects of open angle on frequency parameters of the spherical shell with clamped boundary conditions ($h/R=$0.01, $v=$0.3, ${\phi}_{0}=$0°): a) $n=$0, b) $n=$1, c) $n=$2, d) $n=$3
3.4. Effects of thickness to radius ratio
Effects of the ratio of thickness to radius on frequency parameters are presented in Fig. 10 and Fig. 11. Generally, frequency parameters are increased by the increase of the ratio of thickness to radius. However, effects of the ratio of thickness to radius on frequency parameters are dependent on the mode shape, open angle and boundary conditions. As the open angle increases, effects of the ratio of thickness to radius rapidly decrease, especially for $n=$0 and $n=$1, frequency parameters of which keep basically unchanged.
3.5. Effects of thickness discontinuity
In above study, the thickness of the shell is uniform, and nonuniform thickness can be also analyzed by present method. As a special case, a twostepped hemispherical shell is employed and Fig. 12 shows the schematic diagram.
Influences of the location of thickness discontinuity on frequency parameters of the free and clamped hemispherical shell are presented in Fig. 13 and Fig. 14, respectively. It’s observed that tendencies of frequency parameters versus azimuth angle vary with circumferential mode numbers and boundary conditions.
Fig. 10. Effects of the ratio of thickness to radius on frequency parameters of the spherical shell with free boundary conditions ($v=$0.3, ${\phi}_{0}=$0°): a) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 45°, b) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 90°, c) ${\phi}_{1}=$135°
Fig. 11. Effects of the ratio of thickness to radius on frequency parameters of the spherical shell with clamped boundary conditions ($v=$0.3, ${\phi}_{0}=$0°): a) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 45°, b) ${\phi}_{1}=$ 90°, c) ${\phi}_{1}=$135°
However, no matter what the modes and boundary conditions are, the tendencies of ${h}_{1}/{h}_{2}=$0.5 and ${h}_{1}/{h}_{2}=$2 are basically opposite. In the following analysis, effects of the discontinuity on frequency parameters of the hemispherical shell with ${h}_{1}/{h}_{2}=$2 are discussed in detail.
Fig. 12. Schematic diagram of a twostepped hemispherical shell
For the free hemispherical shell with ${h}_{1}/{h}_{2}=$2, the increase of azimuth angle of discontinuity may lead to the increase or decrease of frequency parameters as circumferential mode number is 0 and 1. Nevertheless, as circumferential mode number is 2 and 3, frequency parameter certainly decreases as the azimuth angle of discontinuity increases. It’s further observed that, as the azimuth angle of discontinuity is small, effects of azimuth angle of discontinuity are negligible for $n=$2 and $n=$3, which is different from those of $n=$0 and $n=$1.
Fig. 13. Effects of thickness discontinuity on frequency parameters of the hemispherical shell with free boundary conditions (${h}_{1}/R=$0.01, $\upsilon =$ 0.3, $m=$1): a) $n=$0, b) $n=$1, c) $n=$2, d) $n=$3
For the clamped hemispherical shell with ${h}_{1}/{h}_{2}=$2, the tendencies of $n=$0 and $n=$1 are simpler than those of $n=$2 and $n=$3. Frequency parameters firstly increase and then decrease as the azimuth angle of discontinuity increases for $n=$0 and $n=$1. For $n=$2 and $n=$3, as shown in Fig. 14(c) and (d), frequency parameters firstly decrease and then increase. Finally, as the azimuth angle closes to 90°, frequency parameters decrease again.
Fig. 14. Effects of thickness discontinuity on frequency parameters of the hemispherical shell with clamped boundary conditions (${h}_{1}/R=$0.01, $v=$0.3, $m=$1): a) $n=$0, b) $n=$1, c) $n=$2, d) $n=$3
4. Conclusions
In present paper, a semianalytical method was proposed to analyze both axisymmetric and asymmetric modes of spherical shells with elastic boundary conditions and discontinuity in thickness. To establish the governing equation, the spherical shell is firstly divided into many narrow strips, which are approximately treated as conical shells. Based on Flügge thin shell theory and power series method, displacements and forces at the crosssection of strips are expressed in terms of eight unknown coefficients. Lastly, continuity conditions of adjacent strips and boundary conditions are assembled to the final governing equation. By comparing frequency parameters of present method with those in literature, high accuracy and wide application of present method are verified. As circumferential mode number is small, frequency parameter may increase or decrease as circumferential mode number increases. On the other hand, the increase of circumferential mode number certainly results in the increase of frequency parameters for no small circumferential mode number. The effects of stiffness constants of elastic boundaries illustrate that meridional and circumferential displacements have the greatest effects on frequency parameters, and the effects of normal displacement and slope becomes obvious as circumferential mode number varies from 0 to 3. For ${\phi}_{0}=$0°, increasing the open angle ${\phi}_{1}$ can significantly reduce the frequency parameters as the open angle is small. However, as the open angle is greater than 125°, the increase of open angle may lead to the increase or decrease of frequency parameters, which strongly depends on the boundary conditions and circumferential mode number. The frequency parameters increase as the ratio of thickness to radius increases. Nevertheless, for $n=$0 and $n=$1, the effect of the ratio thickness to radius is negligible as open angle ${\phi}_{1}$ is between 90° and 135°. The location of thickness discontinuity is of great influence on frequency parameters, and the influence strongly depends on the boundary conditions, circumferential mode number and thickness ratio ${h}_{1}/{h}_{2}$.
The proposed method can accurately and efficiently analyze free vibrations of spherical shells. In the subsequent work, spherical shells coupled with other revolution shells, e.g. cylindrical and conical shells, will be investigated since continuity conditions between spherical shells and others can be accurately satisfied without difficulty. In addition, it should be mentioned that the continuity conditions may be the bottleneck to analyze vibrations of coupled sphericalcylindrical or sphericalconical shells because there are many papers studying coupled cylindricalcylindrical, conicalconical and cylindricalconical shells whereas the literature about couple shells including spherical shells is rare.
Acknowledgements
The present research obtains great financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51179071).
References
 Kalnins A., Naghdi P. Axisymmetric vibrations of shallow elastic spherical shell. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 1960, p. 342347. [Publisher]
 Baker W. E. Axisymmetric modes of vibration of thin spherical shell. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 33, Issue 12, 1961, p. 17491758. [Publisher]
 Hoppmann II W. H., Baker W. E. Extensional vibrations of elastic orthotropic spherical shells. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 1961, p. 229237. [Publisher]
 Hoppmann II W. H. Frequencies of vibration of shallow spherical shells. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 1961, p. 305307. [Publisher]
 Kalnins A. On vibration of shallow spherical shells. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 33, Issue 8, 1961, p. 11021107. [Publisher]
 Naghdi P. M., Kalnins A. On vibrations of elastic spherical shells. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 29, Issue 1, 1962, p. 6572. [Publisher]
 Kalnins A. Effect of bending on vibrations of spherical shells. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 36, Issue 1, 1964, p. 7481. [Publisher]
 Prasad C. On vibration of spherical shells. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 36, Issue 3, 1964, p. 489494. [Publisher]
 Wilkinson J. P., Kalnins A. On nonsymmetric dynamic problems of elastic spherical shells. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 1965, p. 525532. [Publisher]
 Ramakrishnan C. V., Shah A. H. Vibration of an aelotropic spherical shell. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 47, Issue 5, 1970, p. 13661374. [Publisher]
 Martynenko V. S., Shapakova S. G. Asymmetric vibrations of spherical shells. International Applied Mechanics, Vol. 9, Issue 10, 1973, p. 10591063. [Publisher]
 Chakrabarti R. Forced vibrations of nonhomogeneous isotropic elastic spherical shell. Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 112, Issue 1, 1974, p. 5257. [Publisher]
 Kunieda H. Flexural axisymmetric free vibrations of a spherical dome: exact results and approximate solutions. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 92, Issue 1, 1984, p. 110. [Publisher]
 Niordson F. I. Free vibration of thin elastic spherical shells. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 20, Issue 7, 1984, p. 667687. [Publisher]
 Niordson F. I. The spectrum of free vibrations of a thin elastic spherical shell. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 24, Issue 9, 1988, p. 947961. [Publisher]
 Chen W. Q., Ding H. J. Free vibration of multilayered spherically isotropic hollow spheres. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 43, 2001, p. 667680. [Publisher]
 Lee J. Free vibration analysis of spherical caps by the pseudospectral method. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 23, 2009, p. 221228. [Publisher]
 Lee J. Free vibration analysis of a hermetic capsule by pseudospectral method. Journal of Mechanical Sciences and Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 2012, p. 10111015. [Publisher]
 Su Z., Jin G. Y., Shi S. X., Ye T. G. A unified accurate solution for vibration analysis of arbitrary functionally graded spherical shell segments with general end restrains. Composite Structures, Vol. 111, 2014, p. 271284. [Publisher]
 Chernobryvko M. V., Avramov K. V., Romanenko V. N., Batutina T. J., Tonkonogenko A. M. Free linear vibrations of thin axisymmetric parabolic shells. Meccanica, Vol. 49, Issue 12, 2014, p. 28392845. [Publisher]
 Kang J. H. Free vibration analysis of shallow spherical dome by threedimensional Ritz method. Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 22, Issue 11, 2016, p. 27312744. [Publisher]
 Zarghamee M. S. Robinson A. R. A numerical method for analysis of free vibration of spherical shells. AIAA Journal, Vol. 5, Issue 7, 1976, p. 12561261. [Search CrossRef]
 De Souza V. C. M., Croll J. G. A. An energy analysis of the free vibrations of isotropic spherical shell. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 73, Issue 3, 1980, p. 379404. [Publisher]
 Singh A. V., Mirza S. Asymmetric modes and associated eigenvalues spherical shells. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 107, Issue 1, 1985, p. 7782. [Publisher]
 Singh A. V. On vibrations of shells of revolution using Bezier polynomials. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 113, Issue 4, 1991, p. 579584. [Publisher]
 Fan S. C., Luah M. H. Free vibration analysis of arbitrary thin shell structures by using spline finite element. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 179, Issue 5, 1995, p. 763776. [Publisher]
 Gautham B. P., Ganesan N. Free vibration characteristics of isotropic and laminated orthotropic spherical caps. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 204, Issue 1, 1997, p. 1740. [Publisher]
 Wu Y. C., Heyliger P. Free vibration of layered piezoelectric spherical caps. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 245, Issue 3, 2001, p. 527544. [Publisher]
 Sai Ram K. S., Sreedhar Babu T. Free vibration of composite spherical shell cap with and without a cutout. Computers and Structures, Vol. 80, Issue 23, 2002, p. 17491756. [Publisher]
 Artioli E., Viola E. Free vibration analysis of spherical caps using a G.D.Q. numerical method. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 128, Issue 3, 2006, p. 370378. [Publisher]
 Tornabene F., Viola E. Vibration analysis of spherical shell structures element using the GDQ method. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 53, Issue 10, 2007, p. 15381560. [Publisher]
 Simmonds J. G., Hosseinbor A. P. The free and forced vibrations of a closed elastic spherical shell fixed to an equatorial beampart I: the governing equations and special solutions. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 77, Issue 2, 2010, p. 021017. [Publisher]
 Simmonds J. G., Hosseinbor A. P. The free and forced vibrations of a closed elastic spherical shell fixed to an equatorial beampart II: perturbation approximations. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 77, Issue 2, 2010, p. 021018. [Publisher]
 Qu Y. G., Long X. H., Yuan G. Q., Meng G. A unified formulation for vibration analysis of functionally graded shells of revolution with arbitrary boundary conditions. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 50, 2013, p. 381402. [Publisher]
 Choi M. S., Kondou T., Choi H. J. Free vibration analysis of axisymmetric shells with various shapes using Sylvestertransfer stiffness coefficient method. Journal of Mechanical Sciences and Technology, Vol. 29, Issue 7, 2015, p. 27552766. [Publisher]
 Naghsh A., Saadatpour M. M., Azhari M. Free vibration analysis of stringer stiffened general shells of revolution using a meridional finite strip method. ThinWalled Structures, Vol. 94, 2015, p. 651662. [Publisher]
 Cui X. Y., Wang G., Li G. Y. A nodal integration axisymmetric thin shell model using linear interpolation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 40, 2016, p. 27202742. [Publisher]
 Brown D., Brown C. T. Investigation of vibrations of piezoelectric spherical shells with axisymmetric holes. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 19, 2013, p. 030065. [Publisher]
 Leissa A. W. Vibrations of Shells. Acoustical Institute of Physics, New York, 1993. [Search CrossRef]
 Xie K., Chen M. X., Deng N. Q., Jia W. C. Free and forced vibration of submerged ringstiffened conical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions. ThinWalled Structures, Vol. 96, 2015, p. 240255. [Publisher]
 Tong L. Y. Free vibration of orthotropic conical shells. International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 31, Issue 5, 1993, p. 719733. [Publisher]
Articles Citing this One
Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines
Seyed Sajad Mirjavadi, Masoud Forsat, Mohammad Reza Barati, A. M. S Hamouda

2020

Sensors
Dragos Amarie, Nazanin Mosavian, Elijah L. Waters, Dwayne G. Stupack

2020

Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
Bakhodur Abdusatorov, Alexey I. Salimon, Yekaterina D. Bedoshvili, Yelena V. Likhoshway, Alexander M. Korsunsky

2020
