Comparing the performance of suspension system of semi-trailer truck with two air suspension systems
Van Quynh Le
Faculty of Automotive and Power Machinery Engineering,
Thai Nguyen University of Technology,
Abstract. In order to compare the performance of heavy truck suspension system, a 3D dynamic model with 14 degrees of freedom is developed with the dynamic models of the traditional and new air suspension systems to compare the performance of the air suspension systems for reducing the negative impacts on the road surface when vehicle moves on the different road conditions. Dynamic modes of two different types of the air suspension systems are respectively established and a dynamic load coefficient (DLC) is chosen as objective function which uses Matlab/Simulink software to simulate and determine the values of objective function. The results shown that the performance of the new air suspension system is better than the tradition air suspension for reducing the negative impact on road surface under the different operating conditions of vehicle. Especially, the DLC values of wheels at 3rd axle of vehicle with the new air suspension system are respectively reduced by 6.7 %, 7.0 %, 7.4 %, 7.7 % and 8.5 % in comparison with the traditional air suspension system when vehicle moves on the different pavement conditions a velocity of 20 m/s and fully loaded. In addition, the study results not only can provide a reference for designers but also traffic management to reduce the negative impact on road surface.
Keywords: heavy truck, air suspension, dynamic model, dynamic load coefficient.
 Shi X. M., Cai C. S. Simulation of dynamic effects of vehicles on pavement using a 3D interaction model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 135, 2009, p. 736‑744.
 Le Van Quynh, Zhang Jianrun, Liu Xiaobo, Wang Yuan Nonlinear dynamics model and analysis of interaction between vehicle and road surfaces for 5-axle heavy truck. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), Vol. 27, Issue 4, 2011, p. 452‑457.
 Zhengchao Xie, Pak Kinwong, et al. A noise-insensitive semi-active air suspension for heavy-duty vehicles with an integrated fuzzy-wheelbase preview control. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, p. 121953.
 Haider Abid J., Jie Chen, Ameen Nassar A. Equivalent air spring suspension model for quarter-passive model of passenger vehicles. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2015, p. 974020.
 Presthus M. Derivation of Air Spring Model Parameters for Train Simulation. M.S. Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, 2002.
 Fox M. N., Roebuck R. L., Cebon D. Modelling rollinglobe air springs. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 2007, p. 254‑270.
 Berg M. A three-dimensional air spring model with friction and orifice damping. Proceedings of the 16th IA VSD Symposium, the Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and on Tracks, Pretoria, South Africa, 1999.
 Dodds C. J., Robson J. D. The description of road surface roughness. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 31, Issue 2, 1973, p. 175‑183.
 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 8068 Mechanical Vibration-Road Surface Profiles-Reporting of Measured Data, 1995.
 Cole D. J., Cebon D. Truck suspension design to minimise road damage. Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 210, 1996, p. 95‑107.
 Rosnawati Buhari, Munzilah Md Rohani, Mohd Ezree Abdullah Dynamic load coefficient of tyre forces from truck axles. Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 405, Issue 408, 2013, p. 1900‑1911.
 Lu Yongjie, Yang Shaopu, Li Shaohua, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on stochastic dynamic load of a heavy duty vehicle. Applied Mathematical Modeling, Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2010, p. 2698‑2710.
Cite this article
Le Van Quynh Comparing the performance of suspension system of semi‑trailer truck with two air suspension systems. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, Vol. 14, 2017, p. 220‑226.
© JVE International Ltd. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA. Oct 2017, Vol. 14. ISSN 2345-0533