Method to determine test profile in accelerated reliability demonstration test under Type-I censoring
Peng Li1, Yuxiang Li2, Wei Dang3
1, 3Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
2Beijing Institute of Control and Electronic Technology, Beijing, China
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Abstract. Conventional reliability demonstration test (RDT) based on statistical method is widely used in industry as it is simple and convenient to apply. But for products with high reliability and long life, this test method fails to satisfy the demand for short cycle and low cost, and is liable to cause the phenomenon of over-test and short-test. This paper gives a method to determine the accelerated stress profile for RDT under multiple stresses and mechanisms, making it faster to make decision of accept or reject. By raising the levels of sensitive stresses that the product would experience, the test time can be cut down remarkably. We can derive the overall acceleration factor based on the narrow reliability bounds theory. Then we choose the test plan referring to GJB 899A. Furthermore, combined with the reliability qualification test (RQT) profile, the accelerated test profile is acquired. An example is given to illustrate the superior performance of the proposed method over traditional methods.
Keywords: reliability demonstration, type-I censoring, acceleration factor, test profile.
 Willis A. J. Design of a modified SPRT for pipeline leak detection. Computers and Chemical Engineering, Vol. 35, 2011, p. 127‑131.
 Kang Rui, Wang Wenyu, Ma Xiaobing, Chen Qinfeng System level accelerated demonstration tests design: approach and application. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Vol. 94, Issue 23, 2014, p. 1‑6.
 David Han, Debasis Kundu Inference for a step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the generalized exponential distribution under type-I censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 64, Issue 1, 2015, p. 31‑43.
 Rosmaini A., Shahrul K., Ishak A. A., Indra P. A. Failure analysis of machinery component by considering external factors and multiple failure modes – a case study in the processing industry. Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 25, 2012, p. 182‑192.
 Giardina M., Castiglia F., Tomarchio E. Risk assessment of component failure modes and human errors using a new FMECA approach: application in the safety analysis of HDR brachytherapy. Journal of Radiological Protection; Vol. 34, 2014, p. 891‑914.
 Luis Escobar A., William Meeker Q. A review of accelerated test models. Statistical Science, Vol. 21, Issue 4, 2006, p. 552‑577.
 Reliability Methodology for Electronic Systems. FIDES Guide 2009 Edition A.
 Methods for Product Accelerated Testing. Edition 1, IEC 62506, 2013.
 Ditlevsen O. Narrow reliability bounds for structural system. Journal of Structural Mechanics, Vol. 7, Issue 4, 1979, p. 453‑472.
Cite this article
Li Peng, Li Yuxiang, Dang Wei Method to determine test profile in accelerated reliability demonstration test under Type‑I censoring. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, Vol. 14, 2017, p. 306‑312.
© JVE International Ltd. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA. Oct 2017, Vol. 14. ISSN 2345-0533