2103. Implementation of a simulation inversion method into estimating the damping coefficient in blasting

Qingwen Li1, Lu Chen2, Lan Qiao3

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China

3Corresponding author

E-mail: 1qingwenli@ustb.edu.cn, 2chenlu90@163.com, 3lanqiao612@gmail.com

Received 12 March 2016; received in revised form 20 May 2016; accepted 28 June 2016

DOI https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.16961

Abstract. Damping is a mechanism of energy dissipation in shock and vibration. It is difficult to obtain the damping coefficient by theoretical method accurately because of varying material properties, vibration velocity and frequency, especially for the millisecond delay blasting in tunnel excavation. Therefore, the most effective method is simulation inversion by employing large‑scale monitoring data, accurate blast loading model and detailed mechanical parameters. In this paper, in‑situ monitoring data was acquired by Blasting Vibration Recorder. The accurate blast loading was calculated on the basis of neural network method, so the contribution rate coefficient of every sequence blasting in total millisecond delay blasting could be confirmed. Mechanical parameter of the host rock was acquired by Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test. In order to predict the simulated velocity, the numerical model in physical dimensions was built by FLAC3D, alongside the constitutive parameters from laboratory tests and different damping coefficients. Compared with the monitoring attenuation law, the damping coefficient of host rock could be finally confirmed.

Keywords: blasting vibration, accurate blast loading, neural network, damping coefficient, simulation inversion.


[1]        Elmenshawia A., et al. Damping mechanisms and damping ratios in vibrating unreinforced stone masonry. Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, 2010, p. 3269‑3278.

[2]        Rezaiee-pajand M., et al. A new method of fictitious viscous damping determination for the dynamic relaxation method. Computers and Structures, Vol. 89, 2011, p. 783‑794.

[3]        Hubbard T., George Mavroeidis P. Damping coefficients for near-fault ground motion response spectra. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, 2011, p. 401‑417.

[4]        Crow H., Hunter J. A., Motazedian D. Monofrequency in situ damping measurements in Ottawa area soft soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, 2011, p. 1669‑1677.

[5]        Lu L. Y., Lin G. L., Shih M. H. An experimental study on a generalized Maxwell model for nonlinear viscoelastic dampers used in seismic isolation. Engineering Structures, Vol. 34, 2012, p. 111‑123.

[6]        Araei A. A., et al. Loading frequency effect on stiffness, damping and cyclic strength of modeled rockfill materials. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 33, 2012, p. 1‑18.

[7]        Sarlin E., et al. Vibration damping properties of steel/rubber/composite hybrid structures. Composite Structures, Vol. 94, 2012, p. 3327‑3335.

[8]        Senetakis K., Anastasios Anastasiadis, Kyriazis Pitilakis Normalized shear modulus reduction and damping ratio curves of quartz sand and rhyolitic crushed rock. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 53, Issue 6, 2013, p. 879‑893.

[9]        Omidi O., Valliappan S., Lotfi V. Seismic cracking of concrete gravity dams by plastic‑damage model using different damping mechanisms. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 63, 2013, p. 80‑97.

[10]     Khoshnoudian F., Ahmadi E., Azad A. I. Damping coefficients for soil‑structure systems and evaluation of FEMA440 subjected to pulse-like near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vols. 61‑62, 2014, p. 124‑134.

[11]     Jin G., et al. A unified method for the vibration and damping analysis of constrained layer damping cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions. Composite Structures, Vol. 130, 2015, p. 124‑142.

[12]     Boaga J., et al. Soil damping influence on seismic ground response: A parametric analysis for weak to moderate ground motion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 79, 2015, p. 71‑79.

[13]     Wang Z. L., Konietzky H., Shen R. F. Coupled finite element and discrete element method for underground blast in faulted rock masses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 29, 2009, p. 939‑945.

[14]     Wang Z. L., Konietzky H. Modelling of blast-induced fractures in jointed rock masses. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 76, 2009, p. 1945‑1955.

[15]     Choi B. H., et al. Case study of establishing a safe blasting criterion for the pit slopes of an open‑pit coal mine. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 57, 2013, p. 1‑10.

[16]     Azizabadi H. R. M., Mansouri H., Fouché O. Coupling of two methods, waveform superposition and numerical, to model blast vibration effect on slope stability in jointed rock masses. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 61, 2014, p. 42‑49.

[17]     Deng X. F., et al. Numerical study on tunnel damage subject to blast-induced shock wave in jointed rock masses. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 43, 2014, p. 88‑100.

[18]     Resende R., et al. Stress wave propagation test and numerical modelling of an underground complex. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 72, 2014, p. 26‑36.

[19]     Pennetier O., William-Louis M., Langlet A. Numerical and reduced-scale experimental investigation of blast wave shape in underground transportation infrastructure. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 9, Issue 4, 2015, p. 96‑104.

[20]     Zhang B. Y., Li H. H., Wang W. Numerical study of dynamic response and failure analysis of spherical storage tanks under external blast loading. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 34, 2015, p. 209‑217.

[21]     Cabalar A. F., Cevik A. Modelling damping ratio and shear modulus of sand‑mica mixtures using neural networks. Engineering Geology, Vol. 104, 2009, p. 31‑40.

[22]     Rafiai H., Jafari A. Artificial neural networks as a basis for new generation of rock failure criteria. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 48, 2011, p. 1153‑1159.

[23]     Yurdakul M., Akdas H. Modeling uniaxial compressive strength of building stones using non-destructive test results as neural networks input parameters. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47, 2013, p. 1010‑1019.

[24]     Kaunda R. New artificial neural networks for true triaxial stress state analysis and demonstration of intermediate principal stress effects on intact rock strength. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 6, 2014, p. 338‑347.

[25]     Bellamine F., Almansoori A., Elkamel A. Modeling of complex dynamic systems using differential neural networks with the incorporation of a priori knowledge. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 266, 2015, p. 515‑526.

[26]     Aleardi M. Seismic velocity estimation from well log data with genetic algorithms in comparison to neural networks and multilinear approaches. Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 117, 2015, p. 13‑22.

[27]     Li Q., et al. Blasting vibration safety criterion analysis with equivalent elastic boundary: based on accurate loading model. Shock and Vibration, 2015.

[28]     He L., et al. Investigation of dynamic saint-venant’s principle in a cylindrical waveguide‑experimental and numerical results. Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 55, 2015, p. 623‑634.

Cite this article

Li Qingwen, Chen Lu, Qiao Lan Implementation of a simulation inversion method into estimating the damping coefficient in blasting. Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 18, Issue 5, 2016, p. 3037‑3047.


© JVE International Ltd. Journal of Vibroengineering. Aug 2016, Vol. 18, Issue 5. ISSN 1392-8716