94. Attenuation relationships for horizontal component of PGV derived from strong‑motion records from Iran

Masoud Nekooei1, Hamed Babaei2

Department of Earthquake Engineering, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University,
Tehran, Iran

1Corresponding author

E-mail: 1msnekooei@gmail.com, 2hamed.babaei85@gmail.com

(Received 22 February 2016; accepted 5 May 2016)

Abstract. Peak ground velocity (PGV) has many applications in engineering seismology and earthquake engineering but there are relatively few prediction equations for this parameter in comparison with the large numbers of equations for estimating peak ground acceleration [1, 2]. The purpose of this study is to derive the attenuation relationships for larger horizontal component () and geometric mean horizontal component () of PGV for Iran. In the present paper new attenuation relations are proposed based on 484 strong motion recordings from earthquakes in Iran. The prediction equations were derived by regression method. The data set used consists of records with magnitudes 4.57.4 and epicentral distances
1 km
150 km. The theoretical-empirical Relationships obtained in this study is one of the first Studies in PGV field for Iran and is comparable with the world famous relations. Comparisons with other predictive relations from other regions are also carried out.

Keywords: attenuation relationships, PGVH, ground motion, PGV for Iran.

References

[1]        Bommer J., Akkar S. Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong‑motion records from Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, Issue 2, 2007, p. 511‑530.

[2]        Bommer J., Akkar S., Kale O. A model for vertical to horizontal response spectral ratios for Europe and the middle east. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 101, Issue 4, 2011, p. 1783‑1806.

[3]        O’Rourke M. J., Ayala G. Pipeline damage due to wave propagation. ASCE, Vol. 119, Issue 9, 1993, p. 1490‑1498.

[4]        Kaka S. I., Atkinson G. M. Relationships between instrumental ground motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 94, Issue 5, 2004, p. 1738‑1806.

[5]        Newmark N. M., Blume J. A., Kapur K. K. Seismic design spectra for nuclear power plants. Power Division ASCE, Vol. 99, 1973, p. 278‑303.

[6]        Kostadinov M. V., Towhata I. Assessment of Liquefaction inducting peak ground velocity and frequency of horizontal ground shaking at onset of phenomenon. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 22, Issue 4, 2002, p. 309‑322.

[7]        Tso W. K., Zhu T. J., Heidebrecht A. C. Engineering implication of ground motion A/V ratio. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 11, 1992, p. 133‑144.

[8]        Campbell K. W., Bozorgnia Y. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the horizontal component of PGA & PGV & PGD and 5% Damped elastic pseudo-acceleration response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). University of California, Berkeley, Vol. 6, 2013, p. 1‑41.

[9]        Yu Y. X., Jin C. Y. Empirical peak ground velocity attenuation relations based on digital broadband records. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2008.

Cite this article

Nekooei Masoud, Babaei Hamed Attenuation relationships for horizontal component of PGV derived from strong‑motion records from Iran. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue 2, 2016, p. 112‑116.

 

Journal of Measurements in Engineering. June 2016, Volume 4, Issue 2

© JVE International Ltd. ISSN Print 2335-2124, ISSN Online 2424-4635, Kaunas, Lithuania